Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started --skill context7git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-startedWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started/context7)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started/context7"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started/context7/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started/context7"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started/context7.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00493 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00197 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
context7 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 5698c60ee708
context7 is a skill published in the GitHub repository dvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started (21 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 493 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
megalinter-check
Collect MegaLinter lint errors for the current repository. Use when the user wants to know if the code passes linting, why the MegaLinter CI job fails, or before/after fixing lint errors. Two modes - watch a CI job (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines) and parse its logs, or run MegaLinter…
assistant
Assistant — on any repo, scan README→docs→AGENTS→CONTRIBUTING→PR templates→task runners→devcontainer→CI→configs before code; cite sources; prefer AGENTS.md for agent behavior; portable across Cursor/Copilot/Claude; use agent-toolkit CLI when needed.
design-improvement
WHAT - Browser-grounded iterative design improvement. Consumes design-assessment findings, defines direction, prioritizes safe vs ambiguous changes, implements within existing design system, runs app, captures rendered evidence via browser, reviews and iterates. Reuses evidence model — no new scoring framework.
codeql
CodeQL operational workflow — discover/config, run/inspect, triage SARIF findings (rule/query ID, source→sink, evidence), remediate, re-validate. Distinguishes broad MegaLinter linting from semantic security analysis.
confluence-permission
Manage space and page permissions and restrictions. ALWAYS use when user wants to control access, set restrictions, or manage who can view/edit content.
review
WCAG 2.2 AA curated accessibility review — distinguishes automatically detectable, browser-assisted, and manual/human-judgment findings with evidence citations and SC mapping. Composes with design-assessment/design-improvement/frontend-design-review.