Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dwmkerr/claude-toolkit/makefile-developmentnpx skills add dwmkerr/claude-toolkit --skill makefile-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dwmkerr/claude-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dwmkerr/claude-toolkit/makefile-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dwmkerr/claude-toolkit/makefile-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dwmkerr/claude-toolkit/makefile-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00567 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
makefile-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Makefile Development
Create Makefiles following consistent conventions.
Template
default: help
.PHONY: help
help: # Show help for each of the Makefile recipes.
@grep -E '^[a-zA-Z0-9 -]+:.*#' Makefile | sort | while read -r l; do printf "\033[1;32m$$(echo $$l | cut -f 1 -d':')\033[00m:$$(echo $$l | cut -f 2- -d'#')\n"; done
.PHONY: init
init: # Initialise the development environment.
./scripts/init.sh
Conventions
| Element | Convention |
|---|---|
| Filename | Makefile (capitalised, no extension) |
| Default target | default: help as the first line |
.PHONY |
Declare directly above each target |
| Help comments | Single # on the target line: target: # Description. |
| Target names | Lowercase, hyphen-separated (test-e2e, type-check) |
| Complex logic | Delegate to scripts (./scripts/build.sh) rather than inline |
Help Target
The self-documenting help target parses # comments and prints sorted, colour-coded output:
.PHONY: help
help: # Show help for each of the Makefile recipes.
@grep -E '^[a-zA-Z0-9 -]+:.*#' Makefile | sort | while read -r l; do printf "\033[1;32m$$(echo $$l | cut -f 1 -d':')\033[00m:$$(echo $$l | cut -f 2- -d'#')\n"; done
Every target must have a # Description. comment or it won't appear in help output.
Common Targets
| Target | Purpose |
|---|---|
help |
Show available targets (always present) |
init or setup |
Install dependencies, configure environment |
build |
Compile or bundle artifacts |
dev |
Start local development server |
test |
Run test suite |
lint |
Run linters and formatters |
Important
After creating or modifying Makefiles, remind the user:
Use tabs. Makefile recipes require literal tab characters for indentation, not spaces.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 63 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A fee5f576c18e
makefile-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository dwmkerr/claude-toolkit (23 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 567 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…