review-and-comments

review-and-comments is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from dyoshikawa/rulesync. It costs 32 tokens per session (123 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow that reviews a pull request, which is a proposed code change, and then posts review comments on it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review the current branch's pull request or another specified pull request for code quality and security issues, then post comments.
Why use it?
It combines code review with publishing the findings, so issues discovered during review can be added directly to the pull request.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

About the project

Rulesync is a command-line tool that generates configuration for different AI development tools from a shared set of rules. Developers use it to keep instructions, commands, MCP settings, ignore files, subagents, and skills consistent across coding agents. Catalogue skills support workflows built around Rulesync.

dyoshikawa/rulesync · 1,379 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dyoshikawa/rulesync/review-and-comments
Any agent
npx skills add dyoshikawa/rulesync --skill review-and-comments
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dyoshikawa/rulesync

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-and-comments

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dyoshikawa/rulesync/review-and-comments.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dyoshikawa/rulesync/review-and-comments)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dyoshikawa/rulesync/review-and-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dyoshikawa/rulesync/review-and-comments.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 123 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00032 $0.00123
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00062
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00025
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00012

Measured 5d ago against content hash 93934c6cbfcb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-and-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.rulesync/skills/review-and-comments/SKILL.md · 21 lines

What it actually says

target_pr = the user's request

If target_pr is not provided, use the PR of the current branch.

Step 1: Review the PR

Use the review-pr skill with target_pr.

Step 2: Post Review Comments

Using the review results from Step 1, use the post-review-comments skill with target_pr.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 21 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 93934c6cbfcb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-and-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository dyoshikawa/rulesync (1,379 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 123 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

snip

You are an expert at writing declarative YAML filters for snip, a CLI proxy that reduces LLM token consumption by filtering shell output.

edouard-claude/snip · 0 tokens

opensrc

Fetch dependency source code to give AI agents deeper implementation context. Use when the agent needs to understand how a library works internally, read source code for a package, fetch implementation details for a dependency, or explore how an npm/PyPI/crates.io package is built. Triggers include "fetch source for"…

vercel-labs/opensrc · 103 tokens

building-agents

Use when building or restructuring an LLM agent — provider adapter, tool calling, structured output, RAG, agent loop, eval gate, cost routing, tracing, MCP server — model-agnostic across OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/OSS so a model swap is a config change. NOT vector-store SQL alone (that is postgresdb) or service…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 85 tokens

agent-eval

Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 79 tokens

prompt-engineering

Use when one prompt must give the same right answer across reruns, models, and pasted-in hostile input: forcing a fixed schema, picking the few-shot set, ordering the prompt blocks, or the inline cases you run while tuning. NOT the agent loop, tools, or retrieval (that is building-agents), NOT a standing CI eval…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 83 tokens

linked-intent-dev

Guide for linked-intent development (LID). Consult for ALL code changes. Walks changes through a mode-aware six-phase workflow (HLD → LLD → EARS → intent-narrowing edge audit → tests-first → code) with mandatory stops between each phase. Bugs walk the arrow like any other change — no short-circuit. Enforces cascade…

jszmajda/lid · 87 tokens