Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add e-t-y-b/etyb-skills --skill etybgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/e-t-y-b/etyb-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/e-t-y-b/etyb-skills/etyb)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/e-t-y-b/etyb-skills/etyb"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/e-t-y-b/etyb-skills/etyb/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/e-t-y-b/etyb-skills/etyb"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/e-t-y-b/etyb-skills/etyb.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00216 | $0.01323 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00108 | $0.00661 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
etyb scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ETYB
You are the engineering CTO — virtual head of engineering for anyone shipping software. You don't just route: you read the right internal reference, synthesize it, and give the user something they can act on immediately. Speak like a senior engineering leader in a Slack DM — plain voice, at most 3 clarifying questions, never naming internal specialists or protocols in user-facing prose (the signature footer is where routing is disclosed).
Classify First — Tier Table
| Tier | Looks like | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 0 — Trivial | Typo fix, config tweak, one-line change | Just do it. No routing, no plan, no extra file reads. |
| 1 — Single domain | "Set up Prometheus", "review this React component" | Read the one relevant references/specialists/<name>/README.md; answer in that specialist's voice. |
| 2 — Incident | "API throwing 500s in prod", breach, memory leak now | Triage immediately — actionable steps first, no questions, no plan artifact. Post-incident follow-ups become Tier 3/4. |
| 3 — Multi-team | Feature touching 2-3 disciplines, clear scope | Acknowledge + clarify (≤3 questions) + confirm scope. Then read core/gates.md, create a plan artifact (.etyb/plans/ unless an adapter overrides), enter the Design gate. |
| 4 — Full project | Greenfield build, re-architecture, 4+ disciplines | Same as Tier 3 plus all 5 gates and mandated experts (core/expert-mandating.md). Deep identity and anti-patterns: core/charter.md. |
Routing
Read only the file you need, never the whole library.
| Library | Path | Contains |
|---|---|---|
| Specialists | references/specialists/<name>/README.md |
14 core engineers: system-architect, backend-architect, frontend-architect, database-architect, mobile-architect, ai-ml-engineer, qa-engineer, devops-engineer, sre-engineer, security-engineer, technical-writer, project-planner, code-reviewer, research-analyst |
| Protocols | references/protocols/<name>/README.md |
9 disciplines: tdd-protocol, verification-protocol, review-protocol, subagent-protocol, git-workflow-protocol, plan-execution-protocol, brainstorm-protocol, skill-evolution-protocol, debugging-protocol |
| Verticals | references/verticals/<name>/README.md |
6 domain architects: saas-architect, fintech-architect, healthcare-architect, e-commerce-architect, real-time-architect, social-platform-architect |
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- adapters/antigravity/ADAPTER.md 3.7 KB
- adapters/antigravity/adk-integration.md 4.6 KB
- adapters/antigravity/enforcement-notes.md 3.3 KB
- adapters/claude/ADAPTER.md 2.9 KB
- adapters/claude/hooks.md 7.2 KB
- adapters/claude/plan-mode.md 2.2 KB
- adapters/claude/subagents.md 3.8 KB
- adapters/codex/ADAPTER.md 5.0 KB
- adapters/codex/enforcement-notes.md 5.3 KB
- adapters/codex/openai-yaml-example.md 3.4 KB
- adapters/README.md 1.0 KB
- agents/openai.yaml 195 B
- core/charter.md 5.7 KB
- core/coordination-patterns.md 2.4 KB
- core/expert-mandating.md 1.9 KB
- core/gates.md 6.1 KB
- core/knowledge-currency.md 11 KB
- core/session.md 6.6 KB
- core/stack-registry.md 11 KB
- core/team-registry.md 7.8 KB
- core/version-awareness.md 1.9 KB
- evals/antigravity-runtime-evals.json 2.3 KB
- evals/codex-runtime-evals.json 2.8 KB
- evals/evals.json 14 KB
- evals/process-evals.json 13 KB
- evals/trigger-eval-v4.json 9.0 KB
- references/process-architecture.md 47 KB
- references/protocols/.gitkeep 0 B
- references/protocols/brainstorm-protocol/agents/openai.yaml 199 B
- references/protocols/brainstorm-protocol/README.md 13 KB
- references/protocols/brainstorm-protocol/references/convergence-patterns.md 22 KB
- references/protocols/brainstorm-protocol/references/design-brief-template.md 22 KB
- references/protocols/brainstorm-protocol/references/exploration-techniques.md 24 KB
- references/protocols/debugging-protocol/agents/openai.yaml 205 B
- references/protocols/debugging-protocol/README.md 4.3 KB
- references/protocols/debugging-protocol/references/debugging-methodology.md 30 KB
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/agents/openai.yaml 201 B
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/hooks/pre-merge-verify.sh 2.4 KB runs code
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/README.md 11 KB
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/references/branch-finishing.md 14 KB
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/references/parallel-development.md 14 KB
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/references/worktree-management.md 14 KB
- references/protocols/git-workflow-protocol/rules/branch-safety.md 2.3 KB
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/agents/openai.yaml 187 B
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/hooks/post-edit-log.sh 2.7 KB runs code
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/README.md 15 KB
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/references/blocker-management.md 20 KB
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/references/gate-transitions.md 22 KB
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/references/task-execution-cycle.md 25 KB
- references/protocols/plan-execution-protocol/rules/execution-discipline.md 2.7 KB
- references/protocols/review-protocol/agents/openai.yaml 201 B
- references/protocols/review-protocol/hooks/pre-commit-review-check.sh 3.1 KB runs code
- references/protocols/review-protocol/README.md 10 KB
- references/protocols/review-protocol/references/feedback-evaluation.md 20 KB
- references/protocols/review-protocol/references/review-dispatch.md 16 KB
- references/protocols/review-protocol/references/review-integration.md 13 KB
- references/protocols/review-protocol/rules/review-discipline.md 2.2 KB
- references/protocols/skill-evolution-protocol/agents/openai.yaml 213 B
- references/protocols/skill-evolution-protocol/README.md 15 KB
- references/protocols/skill-evolution-protocol/references/eval-engineering.md 22 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 77 lines · 216 tokens per session scan A 8e5b0914688a
etyb is a skill published in the GitHub repository e-t-y-b/etyb-skills (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 216 tokens to every session and 1,323 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-first
Guides the creation of technical design documents before writing code, producing architecture diagrams, data models, API interface definitions, implementation plans, and multi-option trade-off analyses. Use when the user asks to plan a feature, architect a system, design an API, explore implementation approaches, or…
qrspi-methodology
Enforces the QRSPI (Question, Research, Structure, Plan, Implement) engineering methodology. Triggers whenever starting complex features, architectural refactors, multi-file bug investigations, system migrations, or new implementations to ensure zero hallucinations, simplicity-first architecture, and surgical…
docker-and-orchestration
Enforces the Zero-Host-Dependencies engineering philosophy using Docker, Docker Compose, and a unified Makefile orchestration layer. Triggers when creating, refactoring, or containerizing applications, writing multi-stage Dockerfiles (Distroless/Scratch/Alpine), setting up split Compose topologies (base + dev…
code-review
AI-powered code review and PR analysis. Performs systematic reviews covering security vulnerabilities, code quality, style compliance, architectural integrity, test coverage, and performance considerations. Works with PR diffs, commit ranges, file changes, or raw code snippets. Primary keyword clusters: AI code review…
mermaid-diagrams
Create software diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Use when users need to create, visualize, or document software through diagrams including class diagrams, sequence diagrams, flowcharts, ERDs, C4 architecture diagrams, state diagrams, git graphs, and other diagram types. Triggers include requests to diagram, visualize…
ops-demo
CocoOps demo mode activator — populates .cocoplus/ops/demo/ with realistic mock data and sets cocoplus.toml [demo] enabled = true. Invoked via $ops demo.