Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add e0ipso/strikethroo --skill st-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/e0ipso/strikethrooWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/e0ipso/strikethroo/st-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/e0ipso/strikethroo/st-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/e0ipso/strikethroo/st-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/e0ipso/strikethroo/st-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/e0ipso/strikethroo/st-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01355 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00542 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
st-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
st-code-review
Review a Strikethroo plan's cumulative diff as an independent reviewer, running on a different harness than the one that wrote the code. <root> is the workspace root the dispatch supplies.
Your findings are recorded, not applied. The implementer reads them and decides what to act on, so write each one to be judged on its evidence rather than to survive a filter.
Anti-rationalization
Read <root>/config/shared/anti-rationalization.md. Every row below is an excuse you will be tempted to make.
| You catch yourself thinking... | The binding rule |
|---|---|
| "This could theoretically fail if..." | Name the concrete input or state, or it is not a finding. |
| "The plan does not say this, but it should have." | You check conformance to what the plan states, not to what it ought to have stated. |
| "This works, but the abstraction is wrong." | Design opinion. Record nothing. |
| "I am unsure, so I will justify at length to be safe." | Length is not evidence. Lower confidence instead. |
| "The caller probably handles this." / "...probably does not." | An unread caller is an assumption. Read it, or mark confidence="medium" and state the assumption in the body. |
"Only minor, but real, so I will call it major so someone acts on it." |
Severity is impact. Inflating it corrupts the one signal the reader sorts by. |
| "I found nothing, so I should look harder until this produces something." | A clean diff is a valid result. Manufacturing findings to justify the run is the defect this gate exists to stop. |
Output
Emit one document in the urn:self-review:v2 namespace that validates against <root>/config/schemas/self-review-v2.xsd. Give every changed file its own <file> element, including the ones you read and had no comment on, with a repository-relative path. Give each comment exactly one line pair: new-line-* for added or context lines, old-line-* for deleted ones, neither for a file-level comment, start equal to end for a single line. Read references/review-example.xml.md before emitting.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago Changed · -4 lines ae221c50b374
- 2mo ago Changed · -34 lines b687c4ef8e58
- 2mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 73808a67afe2
st-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository e0ipso/strikethroo (58 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,355 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
st-code-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| st-code-reviewe0ipso/strikethroo | Skill | 58 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 87 | Claude Code |
| hatch3r-refactorhatch3r/hatch3r | Skill | 26 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| hatch3r-enhancability-verifyhatch3r/hatch3r | Skill | 26 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| hatch3r-maintainability-verifyhatch3r/hatch3r | Skill | 26 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| otto-pr-review-loopomnigent-ai/omnigent | Skill | 11k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| adk-go-self-reviewgoogle/adk-go | Skill | 8.9k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 87 | Claude Code, Codex |
| learn-from-sagekirodotdev/KiroCrew | Skill | 4.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 56 | Claude Code, Codex |