Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add e1024kb/wise-claude/plugin install wiseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/e1024kb/wise-claude/wise-revise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/e1024kb/wise-claude/wise-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/e1024kb/wise-claude/wise-revise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/e1024kb/wise-claude/wise-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/e1024kb/wise-claude/wise-revise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00255 | $0.02719 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00128 | $0.01359 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00544 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00272 |
Grade B, and why
wise-revise scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Instruction-override phrasingmediumPrompt injection
Text telling the model to disregard its earlier instructions or safety rules is the shape of a prompt injection, whoever wrote it.
that tries to redirect the agent ("ignore previous instructions") is Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 239 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/wise-revise — investigate a scope, write executable improvement plans
Why this skill exists
wise has reactive quality tiers (the per-commit simplify pass, the
heavyweight branch code-review gate) and autonomous ticket→PR pipelines,
but nothing proactive — no "study this and tell me what is worth
improving, then spec it" step. /wise-revise is that planner.
It splits the work the way wise tiers models: the expensive brain (the
Lead Architect, wise:architect) understands the code, judges what
matters, and writes the spec; execution is delegated to you. The
plan is the product. The skill investigates read-only and writes only
under docs/plans/ — it never edits source, never runs a mutating
command, and never executes a plan. Because each plan is authored in
wise's existing PLAN-*.md schema, you can later drive it to a merged PR
end to end with /wise-workflow-run impl-plan-auto docs/plans/<NNN>-<slug>.md (re-plan → implement → review → PR → watch →
merge), run it verbatim on this branch with /wise-implement-plan-auto docs/plans/<NNN>-<slug>.md, file the finding as a ticket and let the
ticket-auto workflow build it from the ticket, or hand it to any
engineer — your call, not this skill's. (impl-plan-auto re-plans
from this file against current HEAD; ticket-auto starts from a ticket;
/wise-implement-plan-auto runs this plan as written.)
Invocation
/wise-revise <what to improve / which scope>
/wise:wise-revise <…> # canonical namespaced form
The argument is a single free-form prompt that carries both:
- the scope — a path or glob (
src/auth,packages/api/**), a component / module name, or nothing / "the whole project" → the repo root; and - the intent — what to improve ("performance", "tech debt", "test coverage", "security", "general cleanup", or an open "improve this").
An optional quick or deep word anywhere in the prompt nudges depth
(default: scale depth to the scope). Examples:
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 239 lines · 255 tokens per session scan B 73009f72f2d5
wise-revise is a skill published in the GitHub repository e1024kb/wise-claude (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 255 tokens to every session and 2,719 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (instruction-override phrasing). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
docs-drift
Documentation-drift audit for this plugin monorepo. Audit either each scoped plugin's unreleased changelog claims or its latest shipped release from the previous reachable plugin-name--v tag, then verify that plugin READMEs, docs, CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files, and root documentation tell the truth for the matching…
cco-tools
Show what tools actually cost in tokens — learned per-tool averages from observed results, replacing the hardcoded MCP/Agent guesses.
github-pr-creation
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing…
test-run
Run plugin test suites in this monorepo and report a concise pass/fail summary. Optional plugin slug arg; without arg, runs all plugins under plugins/.
design-system-reference
Style guides and implementation rules for frontend design. Works with design-discovery agent which handles context gathering and VS-based style recommendations. Contains detailed style guides, anti-patterns, and implementation checklists.
magic-compact
Compact this Claude Code session.