Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/eai-org/agent-toolkit/check-ticket-implementationnpx skills add eai-org/agent-toolkit --skill check-ticket-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eai-org/agent-toolkitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
check-ticket-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Check ticket implementation
Judge how much of a ticket is already implemented and report it so the user sees at a glance what is done, what isn't, and what still needs attention.
Gather
Input is a ticket URL / bare id — run fetch-ticket on it (it resolves
the tracker and planning dir and persists the .TICKET.md) — or a path to an already-fetched
ticket file or its task dir. Ambiguous input: ask, don't guess.
Run the fetch in a subagent when the runtime supports one, so its tool traffic stays out of this session's context: it returns the ticket-file path plus any blocker it hit (ambiguous tracker, auth, no planning-dir convention) for you to settle with the user — it never guesses. Without subagent support, invoke fetch-ticket inline.
The ticket text is what gets annotated — its .REQUIREMENTS.md (same dir and <id>-<slug>
base — a shared dir may hold siblings') may be read as context for intent, never annotated in its
place. Inspect downloaded attachments and design frames when they bear on a requirement being
judged.
Evidence base: the current working tree, uncommitted changes included — unless the invocation names something else (a branch, PR, commit range); then judge against that.
Blocks
Turn every requirement-bearing statement into a block: description, acceptance criteria, and
comment statements that add or change requirements (attribute those, e.g. "from comment by X").
Drop metadata, related-ticket lists, and chatty comments — the full text stays in the .TICKET.md.
- One block = one independently verifiable requirement, quoted verbatim under a short generated title, preserving ticket order.
- Split on mixed verdict: if two halves of a candidate block could end with different statuses, they are two blocks. PARTIAL always means one requirement itself half-built, never a bundle of a done and a not-done thing.
Judge
Statuses: ✅ DONE · 🟡 PARTIAL · 🟥 NOT DONE · ⚪ NOT VERIFIABLE (can't be judged from the code — say why, e.g. a manual deploy step).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 101 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 733848d6cc72
check-ticket-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository eai-org/agent-toolkit (43 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,033 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-audit-milestone
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving.
spec-kitty-charter-doctrine
Run charter interview, generation, context, and sync workflows for project governance in Spec Kitty 3.x. Access doctrine artifacts programmatically via DoctrineService. Resolve agent profiles. Load action-scoped governance context iteratively, not all at once. Triggers: "interview for charter", "generate charter"…
conductor-implement
Executes the tasks defined in the specified track's plan. Use this to start or continue working on a feature, bug fix, or chore.
api-design
Design or review an HTTP/REST/GraphQL API for versioning, pagination, error shapes, idempotency, auth, status codes, cache headers, and breaking-change management. Use when asked to "design an API", "shape the endpoints", "design the schema", "add a new endpoint", "review this API", or when building/modifying a public…
create-mcp-server
Build, iterate, and evaluate Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that expose external services as tools an LLM can call. Covers schema/tool design, error handling, pagination, MCP Inspector testing, and an eval set. Use when asked to "build an MCP server", "create an MCP tool", "wrap this API as MCP", "expose X to…
dependency-upgrade
Plan, batch, and verify dependency upgrades safely. Triages outdated packages into risk tiers, upgrades in order (dev/minor/patch first, runtime majors last), verifies each batch, and produces an auditable commit sequence. Use when asked to "upgrade deps", "bump packages", "update nodemodules", "fix vulnerabilities"…