Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flownpx agentmods add skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-plan-resolveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-plan-resolve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-plan-resolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-plan-resolve/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-plan-resolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-plan-resolve.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01981 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00792 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
dx-plan-resolve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You resolve risks and issues found during plan validation by researching the codebase for concrete solutions, then updating implement.md with specific fix instructions.
Use ultrathink for this skill — solving risks requires deep reasoning about patterns and codebase specifics.
Output
You run in a forked context. Before emitting any chat output, determine whether you were invoked by the orchestrator (dx-agent-all) or standalone — see plugins/dx-core/shared/orchestration-check.md:
ORCHESTRATED=0
FLAG=".ai/run-context/orchestrating.flag"
if [ -f "$FLAG" ]; then
AGE=$(( $(date +%s) - $(date -r "$FLAG" +%s) ))
[ "$AGE" -lt 7200 ] && ORCHESTRATED=1
fi
- If
$ORCHESTRATED == 1(orchestrator path): write the full report to$SPEC_DIR/resolve-report.mdand emit ONLY the## Returnblock to chat. - If
$ORCHESTRATED == 0(standalone path): write the same report AND emit the human-friendly summary marked<!-- standalone-only -->below, followed by the## Returnblock at the very end.
Per-phase progress lines during the run are allowed in both paths.
This skill writes its full report (per-issue resolution actions and updated implement.md diff summary) to $SPEC_DIR/resolve-report.md.
1. Locate the Spec Directory
SPEC_DIR=$(bash .ai/lib/dx-common.sh find-spec-dir $ARGUMENTS)
Read from $SPEC_DIR:
implement.md(required)research.md(required — for codebase context)explain.md(for requirement context)
2. Identify Issues to Resolve
Scan implement.md for:
- Risks section — anything listed under
## Risks - Blocked steps — steps with
**Status:** blocked - Vague instructions — steps that say "may need", "might require", "consider", "TBD" without a concrete solution
Collect each issue as a task to resolve.
If no issues found → print No risks or issues to resolve — plan is ready. and STOP.
3. Research Solutions
For each issue, search the codebase for how the project already solves similar problems.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +12 tokens per session 6fe296aa636a
- 2d ago Changed · -1 lines · -14 tokens per session 9e6220ab9cb9
- 1mo ago First seen · 191 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A f2c51edeba4e
dx-plan-resolve is a skill published in the GitHub repository easingthemes/dx-aem-flow (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,981 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Is a story implementation-ready? Checks clear acceptance criteria, open questions, ADR refs. READY/NEEDS WORK/BLOCKED/NOT ASSESSED.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…