Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add easyinplay/harnessed --skill subtaskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/easyinplay/harnessedWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/easyinplay/harnessed/subtask)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/easyinplay/harnessed/subtask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/easyinplay/harnessed/subtask/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/easyinplay/harnessed/subtask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/easyinplay/harnessed/subtask.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00133 | $0.01030 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
discuss-subtask scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
discuss-subtask workflow (v3)
Overview
1-phase sub-workflow mapping CLAUDE.md "Stage ①.c 子任务层 — superpowers brainstorming" onto harnessed runtime (Phase v3.0-3.4 W0.3 — D-04 Stage ① Discuss 三层 + D-05 phase.invokes_tools conditional fire + Pattern A sub-workflow ship)。
| phase | id | upstream | model | capability / invokes_tools | gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01-brainstorm |
superpowers | opus | {{ capabilities.superpowers-brainstorming.cmd }} + conditional invokes_tools[grill-with-docs, grill-me] |
gate: judgments.subtask-gate.brainstorming.fires |
Capability refs
Sister workflows/capabilities.yaml entries:
superpowers-brainstorming— Bucket 4 (impl: superpowers, cmd: superpowers:brainstorming)grill-with-docs— Bucket 1 mattpocock (impl: mattpocock-skills, cmd: /grill-with-docs)grill-me— Bucket 1 mattpocock (impl: mattpocock-skills, cmd: /grill-me)
Gate ref
Sister workflows/judgments/subtask-gate.yaml:
brainstorming.fires—subtask.approaches >= 2 or subtask.core_algorithm == true or subtask.has_api_contract == true or subtask.error_cost == 'high'
Conditional tool invocation (D-05 invokes_tools)
phase.spec_ambiguous == true→ firegrill-with-docsphase.spec_ambiguous == true AND phase.no_docs == true→ firegrill-me
Invocation
- Slash command:
/discuss-subtask <text>(afterharnessed setup)
Routing rules
跳过条件 (sister CLAUDE.md "子任务层 ❌ 跳过"):
- 常规 CRUD / 跟现有模式一致
- 单一明显实现 (< 20 行 / 一个文件)
- 标准库直接调用
- bug 修复且已知根因
How to invoke
Clarification needs real user dialogue, so run this stage directly in THIS session — do NOT spawn it, and do NOT improvise: follow these steps so the locked spec is persisted for the execution stages.
- Evaluate the clarification criteria for "$ARGUMENTS":
- Strategic — new feature / milestone / unclear business scope → gstack
/office-hours+/plan-ceo-review - Phase — ≥2 open implementation decisions / unclear cross-phase API contract → GSD
/gsd-discuss-phase - Subtask — ≥2 distinct approaches / core algorithm / API contract design / high error cost → superpowers brainstorming
- Strategic — new feature / milestone / unclear business scope → gstack
- For each layer that fires, hold the dialogue with the user (use {{ host.ask_user }} for option-style decisions) and lock every open decision.
- Transparent-skip layers that don't fire — state which were skipped and why.
- Persist the locked decisions to
.planning/via planning-with-files (findings.md/task_plan.md).
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed 73668dc936c4
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 133 tokens per session scan A 796e3de952be
discuss-subtask is a skill published in the GitHub repository easyinplay/harnessed (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 133 tokens to every session and 1,030 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
setup
Setup orchestrator for the Octowiz Bridge. Re-runs the live environment check, builds a gap list, and runs only the phases needed: plugins, memory, repo, verify. Invoked automatically by octowiz:octowiz when hard gaps are detected.
octowiz
Octowiz AI coding workflow coordinator. Reads IntegraHub memory doctrine at runtime, detects where you are in the development lifecycle, and routes to the right skill combination from superpowers + mattpocock-skills. Use this skill at the START of any development work — whether you have a fresh idea, an existing plan…
forge
Run a Planner→Dev→Test→Learn workflow for feature development with automatic bug-fix loops and state checkpointing.
sxo
Search Experience Optimization (SXO), the bridge between SEO and UX/CRO. Audits the journey from the SERP click to the on-page goal: click-through factors (title, meta, rich results), then post-click signals that keep users and drive conversions: above-the-fold relevance and intent match, page speed / Core Web Vitals…
meta-tags-optimizer
Optimize title tags, meta descriptions, Open Graph, and Twitter cards for maximum click-through rate. Generates multiple A/B test variations with character counting and SERP preview. Use when asked to "optimize title tag", "write meta description", "improve CTR", "Open Graph tags", "fix my meta tags", "social media…
chief-strategy-officer
Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business…