Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ecnu-icalk/autoskill/receiving-code-reviewnpx skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill receiving-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ecnu-icalk/autoskill/receiving-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ecnu-icalk/autoskill/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ecnu-icalk/autoskill/receiving-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01515 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00758 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00303 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
receiving-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 215 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A eed92b0413b2
receiving-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill (570 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,515 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
harness-optimizer
Optimize an AI agent's harness for MCP-Atlas benchmark. Use when analyzing execution traces, diagnosing failures, and proposing improved prompts, skills, or harness code.
gui-click-over-keyboard
When to prefer GUI mouse clicks over keyboard shortcuts — especially for formatting, multi-step visual tasks, and cross-application workflows.
data-formats
Reading, writing, and converting common data formats (CSV, Excel, JSON, YAML) with correct handling of encoding, types, and edge cases.
build-compiled-extensions
How to build C/C++/Cython/Fortran extensions and frameworks like Caffe, OpenCV, protobuf-dependent projects from source.
debug-and-fix
Strategies for debugging build failures, runtime errors, writing complete output files (ICS/JSON/config), and constraint satisfaction tasks.
python-data-analysis
Best practices for multi-step Python tasks including data analysis, HuggingFace datasets, token counting, and any task requiring state across multiple python() calls.