Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ed3dai/ed3d-plugins --skill prompt-security-hardeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ed3dai/ed3d-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/prompt-security-hardening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/prompt-security-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/prompt-security-hardening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/prompt-security-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/prompt-security-hardening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02443 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00489 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00244 |
Grade C, and why
prompt-security-hardening scanned grade C with 4 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Harvests environment variablesmediumData exfiltration
Enumerating or grepping the environment for keys collects credentials unrelated to what the mod says it does.
printenv STRIPE_SECRET_KEY Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Asks for rootlowPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
touch .env && chmod 600 .env Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Reaches for credential filesmediumPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
chmod 600 ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ${API_TOKEN}" https://api.example.com/data The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 245 lines · 55 tokens per session scan C fee77973f2e9
prompt-security-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository ed3dai/ed3d-plugins (249 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,443 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 4 findings (harvests environment variables, asks for root, reaches for credential files). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
researcher
Conducts investigative-grade research with primary source analysis, cross-verification, and trial-level depth. Use when an album needs factual research, source material, or verification of claims.
validate-album
Validates album directory structure, file locations, and content integrity. Use before release or whenever the user wants to check an album's structural health.
promote-idea
Converts an album idea from IDEAS.md into an actual album project in one step. Use when the user says "promote [idea title]", "turn idea into album", or "start working on [idea]".
import-art
Places album art files in the correct audio and content directory locations. Use when the user has generated or downloaded album artwork that needs to be saved.
plagiarism-checker
Scans lyrics for phrases that may match existing songs using web search and LLM knowledge. Use before release to check for unintentional borrowing.
verify-sources
Captures human source verification for tracks, timestamps it, and updates track files. Use when sources need human review before generation.