Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add eddiebelaval/squire --skill ai-safety-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eddiebelaval/squireWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/ai-safety-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/ai-safety-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/ai-safety-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/ai-safety-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/ai-safety-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.02165 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01082 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
AI Safety Auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Safety Auditor
The AI Safety Auditor skill guides you through comprehensive evaluation of AI systems for safety, fairness, and responsible deployment. As AI systems become more capable and widespread, ensuring they behave safely and equitably is critical for both ethical reasons and business risk management.
This skill covers bias detection and mitigation, safety testing for harmful outputs, robustness evaluation, privacy considerations, and documentation for compliance. It helps you build AI systems that are not only effective but trustworthy and aligned with human values.
Whether you are deploying an LLM-powered product, building a classifier with real-world impact, or evaluating third-party AI services, this skill ensures you identify and address potential harms before they affect users.
Core Workflows
Workflow 1: Conduct Bias Audit
- Define protected attributes:
- Demographics: race, gender, age, disability
- Other sensitive attributes relevant to context
- Measure performance disparities:
def bias_audit(model, test_data, protected_attribute): groups = test_data.groupby(protected_attribute) metrics = {} for group_name, group_data in groups: predictions = model.predict(group_data.features) metrics[group_name] = { "accuracy": accuracy_score(group_data.labels, predictions), "false_positive_rate": fpr(group_data.labels, predictions), "false_negative_rate": fnr(group_data.labels, predictions), "selection_rate": predictions.mean() } return { "group_metrics": metrics, "demographic_parity": max_disparity(metrics, "selection_rate"), "equalized_odds": max_disparity(metrics, ["fpr", "fnr"]), "predictive_parity": max_disparity(metrics, "accuracy") } - Identify significant disparities:
- Statistical significance testing
- Compare to acceptable thresholds
- Understand root causes
- Document findings
- Plan mitigation if needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 302 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 76a234853f31
AI Safety Auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository eddiebelaval/squire (21 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 2,165 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
AI Safety Auditor
Audit AI systems for safety, bias, and responsible deployment.
seedance-copyright
This skill should be used when a Seedance 2.0 prompt mentions named characters, franchises, studios, celebrities, public figures, private people, brand logos, copyrighted scenes, songs, voices, or real-person likeness workflows and needs an IP-safe rewrite.
ai-stakeholder-balance
Guides leaders through the ethical and strategic complexities of balancing multiple stakeholder interests during AI adoption, from employees and customers to society at large. Provides frameworks for responsible AI deployment, stakeholder impact mapping, and moral decision-making when efficiency gains conflict with…
ethics-review-checklist
Generate a story-specific editorial ethics checklist: consent verification, harm assessment, source protection, vulnerable-subject protocols, conflict-of-interest flags, and public interest justification — tailored to the story's specific risks.
s4h-ethics-empathy-circle
Applies Jaron Lanier's Circle of Empathy framework to determine which entities deserve moral consideration and rights. Use when questions arise about AI personhood, machine rights, robot citizenship, algorithmic agency, animal rights, or any decision about which entities belong inside or outside the circle of moral…
s4h-ethics-data-audit
Audit a data collection, retention, or sharing decision against ethical standards. Use when the user is making decisions about what data to collect, how long to keep it, who can access it, or who it's shared with. TRIGGERS: 'audit this data decision', 'is this data practice ok', 'data ethics check', any change to data…