Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add eddmann/agent-toolkit --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eddmann/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddmann/agent-toolkit/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddmann/agent-toolkit/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eddmann/agent-toolkit/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddmann/agent-toolkit/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eddmann/agent-toolkit/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00446 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00178 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 43 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A e898f12c3aa8
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository eddmann/agent-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 446 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
Release gentle-pi through GitHub and npm. Trigger: release, publish, npm publish, GitHub release, version bump.
gentle-ai-work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
commit
A commit candidate is the exact patch that will enter the commit. A coherent change has one task or issue as its reason for existing.
github-platform
GitHub pull requests, review threads, failing Actions checks and stacked pull requests, through GitHub's MCP server and the gh CLI. Use when opening, reviewing or updating a pull request, fixing a failed check, or splitting a change into a stack.
gitlab-platform
GitLab merge requests, review threads, failed pipelines and stacked merge requests, through GitLab's MCP server and the glab CLI. Use when opening, reviewing or updating a merge request, fixing a failed pipeline, or splitting a change into a stack.
gh-address-comments
Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.