swift-code-review

swift-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from edheltzel/Do-Skills. It costs 47 tokens per session (989 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A code review helper for Swift, Apple's programming language for its platforms. It checks concurrency safety, error handling, memory management, and common mistakes, including async/await and actor isolation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing Swift files, especially code using async/await, actors, or Sendable conformance.
Why use it?
It helps find bugs caused by unsafe concurrent work, unhandled errors, or incorrect memory use. It provides a focused review for Swift code rather than only general feedback.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — body not stored (licence); the path alone says nothing.

Good fit Use it when reviewing Swift files, especially code using async/await, actors, or Sendable conformance.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add edheltzel/Do-Skills --skill swift-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edheltzel/Do-Skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for swift-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for swift-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/swift-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 989 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.00989
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00396
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00198
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00099

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 8b5d27415a1f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

swift-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/project/swift/do-review-ios/references/swift-code-review/SKILL.md · 80 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 8b5d27415a1f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

swift-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository edheltzel/Do-Skills (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 989 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

axiom-audit-codable

Use when the user mentions Codable review, JSON encoding/decoding issues, data serialization audit, or modernizing legacy code.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 32 tokens

axiom-swift-simplifier

Use when the user wants to simplify Swift code, reduce boilerplate, or make Swift more readable and idiomatic without changing behavior.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 34 tokens

kotlin-concurrency-and-flow

Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin coroutine scope ownership, raw Thread or Executor work, init launches, non-suspending launch APIs, runBlocking, cancellation, StateFlow, SharedFlow, Channel, stateIn, SharingStarted, state updates, or one-shot events.

chrisbanes/skills · 60 tokens

kotlin-api-design

Use when designing or reviewing Kotlin function ownership, member or extension functions, factories, single-field domain types, value classes, data classes, Kotlin Multiplatform expect/actual declarations, or platform service boundaries.

chrisbanes/skills · 46 tokens

coding-best-practices

Reviews Swift/iOS code for adherence to modern Swift idioms, Apple platform best practices, architecture patterns, and code quality standards. Use when user mentions best practices, code review, clean code, refactoring, or wants to improve code quality.

rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills · 55 tokens

swift-concurrency-review

Review Swift 6 strict-concurrency and SwiftUI code for idiom and build-breaking issues - non-Sendable across actor boundaries, @MainActor witness vs nonisolated protocol requirements, Combine/ObservableObject usage, force-unwraps, #Predicate macro limits, the 6.3.x Binding IRGen crash, missing #if os() guards, and…

charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev · 94 tokens