Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Edison-Watch/Custom-MCPs. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Edison-Watch/Custom-MCPs/main/.claude/skills/code-quality/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Edison-Watch/Custom-MCPsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/edison-watch/custom-mcps/code-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/edison-watch/custom-mcps/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edison-watch/custom-mcps/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/edison-watch/custom-mcps/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edison-watch/custom-mcps/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00241 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00096 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-quality — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Code Quality Skill
This skill provides instructions for running code quality checks and maintaining standards in the Python-Template project.
Commands
Use the following make targets to ensure code quality:
make fmt: Runs theruffformatter and formats JSON files.make ruff: Runs therufflinter to catch common errors and style issues.make vulture: Searches for dead code across the project.make ty: Runs thetytype checker to ensure type safety.make ci: Runs all of the above checks (ruff,vulture,import_lint,ty,docs_lint,check_deps) in sequence.
Workflow
- Before Committing: Always run
make fmtandmake ruff. - Major Changes: Run
make cito ensure no regressions in types or dead code. - Continuous Integration: These checks are enforced in the CI pipeline. Ensure all pass before opening a PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 808edd1203ee
code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository Edison-Watch/Custom-MCPs (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-quality, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…