Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add eftechcombr/glpi --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eftechcombr/glpiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eftechcombr/glpi/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eftechcombr/glpi/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eftechcombr/glpi/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eftechcombr/glpi/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eftechcombr/glpi/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00025 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
Pr Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 11 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A ae3a71208d07
Pr Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository eftechcombr/glpi (33 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 63 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-quality
Comprehensive code review for Java - clean code principles, API contracts, null safety, exception handling, and performance. Use when user says "review code", "refactor", "check API", or before merging changes.
lint
Lint and format Kurtosis Starlark files. Check syntax, validate docstrings, and auto-format .star files. Use when writing or reviewing Starlark packages to ensure code quality.
container-manager-kubernetes-operations
Full operational Kubernetes surface via the container-manager-mcp MCP server — workloads (pods/rollouts/StatefulSets/DaemonSets/ReplicaSets/Jobs/CronJobs), config (ConfigMaps/Secrets/Namespaces/CRDs/patch), networking (Ingress/native Services/NetworkPolicy/DNS), storage (PV/PVC/StorageClass/snapshots/CSI), RBAC…
devops-infra
DevOps & Infrastructure (Docker, AWS, Messaging): Helps with Docker configuration, AWS architecture, CI/CD pipelines, Kubernetes, monitoring, and messaging infrastructure (Kafka, SQS, SNS). Use whenever the user wants to review or create Dockerfiles, docker-compose configs, AWS architecture, CI/CD pipelines…
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.