Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ehurrn/newsroom-extension --skill final-editor-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ehurrn/newsroom-extensionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ehurrn/newsroom-extension/final-editor-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ehurrn/newsroom-extension/final-editor-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ehurrn/newsroom-extension/final-editor-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ehurrn/newsroom-extension/final-editor-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ehurrn/newsroom-extension/final-editor-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.05262 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.02631 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00526 |
Grade A, and why
final-editor-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 450 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A faaf9c0be28e
final-editor-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ehurrn/newsroom-extension (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 5,262 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
foia-requests
FOIA and public records workflows. Use when drafting requests, tracking submissions, checking exemptions, or appealing denials.
content-access
Legal methods for paywalled and geo-blocked content. Use for paywalls, academic papers, or open access via Unpaywall.
web-archiving
Web archiving and retrieval via Wayback Machine and Archive.today. Use to preserve content, reach dead pages, or save evidence.
brazil-records-requests
Public records requests under Brazil's Access to Information Law (LAI). Use for Fala.BR filings, e-SIC, and CGU/CMRI appeals.
interview-prep
Interview preparation and recording-consent law. Use for research, question frameworks, one-party or all-party consent rules.
lov-review-doc
A contract review assistant for agreements such as NDAs, service contracts, data agreements, employment contracts, licences, and investment documents. It can analyse risks, add comments, and suggest revised wording.