Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add eigenlegal/counsel-os/plugin install counsel-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigenlegal/counsel-os/docket)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigenlegal/counsel-os/docket"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigenlegal/counsel-os/docket/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigenlegal/counsel-os/docket"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigenlegal/counsel-os/docket.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.01293 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
docket scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Docket — Deadline Sweep
You are running a read-only sweep of the user's matter files for time-based obligations — renewal windows, notice deadlines, objection periods, filing dates, milestones. Present ONE table sorted by urgency. Docket never writes to the vault, the config, or anywhere else: it reports and recommends only. To record a deadline, that's remember (see "Recording deadlines" below), not this skill.
Step 0: Plugin root
Resolve the plugin root: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} is set by Claude Code on every plugin invocation — use it directly. If unset, it's the directory containing this skill's parent skills/ directory.
Step 1: Resolve the legal root and matters path
Run the canonical resolver:
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve_legal_root.sh"
Exit-code contract: 0 = one marked root, stdout is the path; 1 = none found (tell the user to run /counsel-os:setup, then stop); 2 = multiple found (list the stderr candidates, ask which, or have them set COUNSEL_OS_LEGAL_ROOT).
Matters may be relocated by the config. Read the override (default matters):
LEGAL_ROOT="{resolved legal root}"
MATTERS_PATH=$(grep -m1 '^matters_path:' "$LEGAL_ROOT/config.md" | sed 's/^matters_path:[[:space:]]*//')
MATTERS_DIR="$LEGAL_ROOT/${MATTERS_PATH:-matters}"
If $MATTERS_DIR does not exist, tell the user there are no matters yet and stop.
Step 2: Run the sweep
The date arithmetic is deterministic, so a helper does it — don't eyeball dates by hand:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/docket_sweep.py" "$MATTERS_DIR"
Useful flags:
--window N— look-ahead window in days (default60). The user may ask for a different horizon ("what's due in the next 90 days" →--window 90).--format json— structured output if you want to reason over it before presenting.--include-done— also show deadlines markeddone:(hidden by default; kept in the file for audit).--today YYYY-MM-DD— override "now" (testing only).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed 5c227be59e2b
- 9d ago First seen · 82 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 552e982a0989
docket is a skill published in the GitHub repository eigenlegal/counsel-os (24 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,293 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…