Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add eigent-ai/agent-skills --skill contract-review-risk-scoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eigent-ai/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/contract-review-risk-scoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/contract-review-risk-scoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/contract-review-risk-scoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/contract-review-risk-scoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/contract-review-risk-scoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00617 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review-risk-scoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract Review & Risk Scoring
Focused contract review built on CUAD (41 risk categories), ContractEval benchmarks, and LegalBench.
Source Repository
- GitHub: evolsb/claude-legal-skill
- Install upstream:
npx skills add evolsb/claude-legal-skill
Covers NDAs, SaaS/MSA, M&A, payment agreements, and finder/broker agreements.
/review [contract] as [your position]
Core skill. Reads the full contract, maps clauses against CUAD's 41 risk categories, assigns severity (low / medium / high / critical), benchmarks key terms against market norms, and outputs a prioritised fix list with concrete redline language. Finishes with an overall Contract Safety Score.
Workflow:
- Confirm document type and user's position (customer, vendor, receiving party, acquirer, etc.).
- Parse and enumerate all material clauses.
- Score each clause against CUAD risk categories.
- Benchmark flagged terms vs market norms.
- Assign negotiability rating per issue (easy / moderate / hard).
- Draft specific redline language for top issues.
- Output Contract Safety Score (0–100) with summary.
Output structure:
## Contract Safety Score: [score]/100
## Critical Issues (fix before signing)
## High / Medium / Low Issues
## Market Benchmark Comparison
## Recommended Redlines (prioritised)
## Negotiation Strategy Notes
Example Prompts
- Review this NDA [paste] — I'm the receiving party. Flag unusual confidentiality scope, one-sided carve-outs, non-compete buried in obligations. Contract Safety Score + top 3 redlines.
- Review this SaaS subscription agreement [paste] — I'm the customer. Check liability caps, data ownership, unilateral change clauses, auto-renewal. Compare to market norms.
- Review this LOI [paste] — I'm the acquirer. Flag provisions locking us in early, limiting diligence rights, or unusual exclusivity. Score overall risk; critical issues first.
Guardrails
- This is decision support, not legal advice. Include a disclaimer when delivering output.
- Do not skip boilerplate — buried risk often lives in definitions and general provisions.
- When contract text is incomplete, state what cannot be assessed.
- Prefer specific redline language over vague "negotiate this" notes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 61 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A a29a4af6f921
contract-review-risk-scoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository eigent-ai/agent-skills (19 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 617 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…