Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add eigent-ai/agent-skills --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eigent-ai/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigent-ai/agent-skills/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00398 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00199 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review
Overview
Use this skill for code-review work. Prioritize bugs, behavioral regressions, security risks, performance issues, and missing tests. Findings come first, ordered by severity, with concrete file and line references whenever possible.
Workflow
- Inspect the requested diff, files, branch, or pull request context.
- Review across five axes:
- Correctness.
- Security.
- Performance.
- Readability.
- Maintainability.
- Check whether tests cover the changed behavior and important failure modes.
- Keep feedback specific and actionable; avoid broad style commentary unless it affects maintainability or correctness.
- Flag issues by severity:
- Blocking: should not ship.
- High: likely bug, security issue, or serious regression.
- Medium: meaningful risk or missing coverage.
- Low: small maintainability or clarity improvement.
- If no issues are found, say so clearly and mention residual test gaps or assumptions.
Output Pattern
- Findings first, ordered by severity.
- Open questions or assumptions.
- Brief change summary only after findings.
- Tests or verification reviewed.
Example Prompts
/review - Review this pull request. Flag anything that affects security, performance, or will be hard to maintain in 6 months. Be direct about blocking issues./review - Audit this API endpoint handler for security issues. Check for injection risks, missing auth checks, improper error handling, and data exposure./review - This is going to production tomorrow. Do a final review focused only on breaking changes, regressions, and anything that could cause an incident.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 42 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 7cfe14d1cee4
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository eigent-ai/agent-skills (19 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 398 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…