tabular-review

tabular-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from eigenweltlabs/legalwork. It costs 115 tokens per session (3,009 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A document-review workflow that extracts the same defined fields from many documents into a table. Each result includes the source and a quotation supporting the extracted value, or says when the information was not found.

In plain words
What is it for?
Comparing contracts or other document sets, extracting fields such as parties or terms, and producing a self-contained, source-cited review table.
Why use it?
It replaces repeated manual comparison across documents with a consistent row-and-column review. The source evidence makes each table entry easier to check.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions OpenCode.

Not installable: its command points at a path on the author’s own machine, so it runs nowhere else. The line is /Users/.../ndas/acme.pdf.

Good fit Comparing contracts or other document sets, extracting fields such as parties or terms, and producing a self-contained, source-cited review table.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tabular-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigenweltlabs/legalwork/tabular-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigenweltlabs/legalwork/tabular-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigenweltlabs/legalwork/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigenweltlabs/legalwork/tabular-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for tabular-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eigenweltlabs/legalwork/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eigenweltlabs/legalwork/tabular-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 115 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,009 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00115 $0.03009
Opus 5 $0.00057 $0.01504
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00602
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00301

Measured 11d ago against content hash e6f0c4371b0d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tabular-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 3 executable files (assets/build-review.mjs, assets/vendor/pdf.min.js, assets/vendor/pdf.worker.min.js), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

apps/server/resources/core-opencode/skills/tabular-review/SKILL.md · 236 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Tabular Review

This skill is how this firm runs tabular document review — the workflow Harvey and Legora call a "review grid": documents are rows, the fields you care about are columns, and every cell is an independent, source-cited extraction. Unlike the SaaS versions, this runs on the firm's own models and infrastructure, the column logic lives in firm-owned doctype skills, and the output is a self-contained artifact the firm keeps.

You are the orchestrator. You do not read the documents yourself. You define the grid, fan out one document-extractor subagent per document, then assemble the results into one HTML artifact.

The shape of the job

                 Parties     Term      Governing law   Assignment ...   ← columns (fields)
  acme_nda.pdf   [cell]      [cell]    [cell]          [cell]
  beta_msa.pdf   [cell]      [cell]    [cell]          [cell]      ← rows (documents)
  ...

Each cell = a short value (what shows in the grid) plus, behind a click, a longer reason, one verbatim quote sentence, and the cited PDF page rendered with that sentence highlighted. Every value is grounded in a quote from that document or it is "Not found". No hallucinated cells.


Workflow

1. Resolve the document set (rows)

Find the files to review. They may be attached, referenced by @path, named in the prompt, or sitting in a folder ("review the NDAs in ./ndas"). Use glob/list to expand folders. Confirm the list with the user if it's ambiguous or large (>~20).

Sniff the document type of each file (from filename and, if cheap, a first-page peek). You'll use this both to pick columns and to tell each extractor what it's looking at. A set can be mixed (some NDAs, some leases) — that's fine; group by type.

2. Resolve the columns (fields) — THIS IS THE BRANCH POINT

Columns can come from three places, in priority order:

  1. The user already specified them. ("Extract party names, term, and governing law.") Use those verbatim; only add a column if you ask first.
  2. A loaded doctype skill. Look for a skill named doctype-<type> (e.g. doctype-nda, doctype-commercial-lease). If one matches the documents, load it with the skill tool and use its recommended columns as the default set. List available skills first if unsure what exists.
  3. Neither → ASK THE USER. Do not invent a column set silently. Detect the doc types, then ask what to extract and propose a starter set based on those types, using the suggestion library below. Make it a one-tap decision: offer the suggested columns and let them add/remove. Example:

Read the full file on GitHub · 236 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 236 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A e6f0c4371b0d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tabular-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository eigenweltlabs/legalwork (106 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 3,009 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.