prefab-standards-reviewer

prefab-standards-reviewer is a skill for Codex from eiway112/prefab-interior-skills. It costs 127 tokens per session (5,936 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review tool for checking technical claims in prefabricated-interior design documents against current construction standards. It examines numbers, standard references, clause numbers, terminology, and source labels.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing specifications and skill files covering walls, partitions, ceilings, floors, kitchens, bathrooms, and other building components, then producing a findings and revision report.
Why use it?
It helps find outdated standards, incorrect measurements, mismatched clause references, and unclear technical wording before the document is used.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit It is for reviewing specifications and skill files covering walls, partitions, ceilings, floors, kitchens, bathrooms, and other building components, then producing a findings and revision report.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add eiway112/prefab-interior-skills --skill prefab-standards-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for prefab-standards-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for prefab-standards-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eiway112/prefab-interior-skills/prefab-standards-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 127 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,936 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00127 $0.05936
Opus 5 $0.00063 $0.02968
Sonnet 5 $0.00025 $0.01187
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00594

Measured 12d ago against content hash 223458c5c6d6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

prefab-standards-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 3 executable files (sr_ic07_compliance_test.py, sre_reasoner.py, sre_regression_test.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

技能仓备份/prefab-standards-reviewer/SKILL.md · 390 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 390 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

装配式装修规范标准复核

技能定位

本技能用于系统化核验装配式装修技能文件中的技术指标是否符合现行规范标准,确保输出内容的权威性和准确性。默认行为是输出复核报告、问题清单和建议修订,不直接修改源文件;只有在用户明确要求执行整改时,才进入文件修改流程。

版本说明(v2.2.0):本批完成 SR IC-07 闭环——① 新增「接口契约(IC-07 / IC-10 接收方)」章节,锚定 interface-contracts.md §4.4 请求/响应字段与降级行为;② 本地 5 条通用行为红线全量映射至全局编号(含新注册 SR-R-P0-3 / P1-7 / P2-4 三条),红线总数 11→14 条;③ 新增「多文件认知架构」A-D 分层标注(E 层不适用质量工具)。关联 CG-20260813-038。

SRE 成熟度声明(v2.1.0):本技能内置标准推理引擎(SRE)参考实现 sre_reasoner.py 与回归测试集 sre_regression_test.py,已覆盖 M1 分类、M3 场景推理(含 Step 1a 性能需求裁定)、M4 适用性裁判、M6 降级等核心规则。IC-10 接口升级至 v1.5.8,响应包含结构化证据对象与决策轨迹。当前 SRE 处于引擎化第一阶段(L1 可执行),安全类与合规类结论仍需条文级证据并经人工复核。

复核流程

第一阶段:准备

  1. 明确复核范围

    • 确认需要复核的技能文件(SKILL.md、reference.md、examples.md)
    • 识别文件中的所有技术指标表格
    • 列出需要核验的关键数据项(数值、标准编号、条款号)
  2. 建立复核清单

复核清单:
- [ ] 标准编号及年份准确性
- [ ] 技术指标数值与标准原文一致性
- [ ] 标准引用条款号正确性
- [ ] 术语使用规范性
- [ ] 边界符号(≥/>/≤/<)准确性
- [ ] 数据来源标注清晰性
- [ ] 同一指标前后一致性

第二阶段:标准核验

  1. 搜索现行规范标准

    • 搜索标准编号+关键词,获取最新有效版本
    • 优先搜索住建部官网、国家标准全文公开系统、地方住建部门网站
    • 记录标准实施日期、废止状态、替代关系
  2. 核验技术指标数值

    • 对比技能文件中的数值与标准原文
    • 注意区分:强制性指标 vs 推荐性指标、实验室指标 vs 现场指标
    • 记录发现的差异
  3. 核验标准引用

    • 验证标准编号年份是否正确(如GB 55038-2025而非GB 55038-2024)
    • 验证条款号是否对应正确的章节主题
    • 验证标准名称是否完整准确

第三阶段:问题诊断

对发现的每个问题进行分类:

问题类型 严重程度 示例
标准年份错误 GB 55038-2024应为GB 55038-2025
指标数值错误 隔声指标与标准原文不符
指标体系错误 住宅分户墙引GB 55038但用Rw+Ctr(应用DnT,w+C)
依据标准错配 办公隔声引用GB 50189(节能)而非GB 50118(隔声)
术语使用不当 混淆实验室指标与现场指标
边界符号错误 "≥"应为">"或反之
数据来源未标注 未区分标准数据与经验数据
前后不一致 同一指标在不同位置表述不同

第四阶段:修正建议

  1. 生成问题清单

    • 按严重程度排序
    • 每个问题包含:原内容、问题描述、建议修正、依据来源
  2. 形成建议修订

    • 输出建议修改内容、修改位置和依据来源
    • 除非用户明确要求执行整改,否则不直接修改文件
    • 记录建议修订历史,便于后续回归核验
  3. 一致性检查

    • 如果是多文件技能,检查主技能与子技能之间的一致性
    • 确保术语、符号、指标体系在所有文件中统一

第五阶段:输出报告

生成详细复核报告,包含以下结构:

# [技能名称]规范标准复核报告

## 复核日期
YYYY-MM-DD

## 复核范围
- 复核文件:SKILL.md、reference.md、examples.md
- 重点内容:[具体说明]

## 标准核验结果

### 已确认准确的标准引用
1. [标准编号]《标准名称》— 核验通过

### 发现并修正的问题

#### 问题1:[问题类型]
- **位置**:[文件+行号/章节]
- **原内容**:[原文]
- **问题描述**:[说明]
- **修正后**:[修正内容]
- **依据**:[标准编号+条款/来源]

## 一致性检查
- 主技能与子技能一致性:通过/发现X处差异
- 术语使用一致性:通过/发现X处差异

## 结论
本次复核共发现X处问题,已全部修正/待修正。复核后技能文件符合现行规范标准要求。

Read the full file on GitHub · 390 lines

Files

What ships with it

6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 390 lines · 127 tokens per session scan A 223458c5c6d6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

prefab-standards-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository eiway112/prefab-interior-skills (4 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 127 tokens to every session and 5,936 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens

external-purchases

US web checkout via the StoreKit External Purchase Link entitlement — currently 0% Apple commission (litigation ongoing), how to ship it safely, and how to architect for a commission flip so a future ruling is a config change, not a rewrite. Use when adding external purchase links, weighing web checkout vs IAP, or…

rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills · 76 tokens