bt6-provider-review

bt6-provider-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from elder-plinius/T3MP3ST. It costs 46 tokens per session (810 once invoked), scanned A, original, AGPL-3.0.

A review process for checking an outside AI or API service and how it is connected to a BT6 code repository. It examines whether the service, credentials, models, and integration match the stated claims.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify an AI provider, inspect trust boundaries and secret handling, check API and model details, trace claims to evidence, and assess whether the repository is ready to merge.
Why use it?
It helps uncover integrations that are incomplete, incorrectly configured, unsafe with secrets, or not supported by independent evidence before they are merged.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — body not stored (licence); the path alone says nothing.

Good fit Use it to verify an AI provider, inspect trust boundaries and secret handling, check API and model details, trace claims to evidence, and assess whether the repository is ready to merge.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review
About the project

T3MP3ST is a self-hosted, multi-agent offensive-security framework that coordinates an AI coding agent through reconnaissance, exploitation, and reporting against authorized targets. Security researchers and red teams use it through a browser interface or command line with supported coding agents or locally run models. Catalogue add-ons provide agents and skills for operating the framework.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 6,081 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add elder-plinius/T3MP3ST --skill bt6-provider-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elder-plinius/T3MP3ST

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bt6-provider-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bt6-provider-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/elder-plinius/t3mp3st/bt6-provider-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 810 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.00810
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00405
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00162
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00081

Measured 12d ago against content hash a95ac6d2be20, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bt6-provider-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.aiwg/plugins/bt6-maintainer/payload/skills/bt6-provider-review/SKILL.md · 81 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed AGPL-3.0

The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 81 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A a95ac6d2be20

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bt6-provider-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository elder-plinius/T3MP3ST (6,081 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 810 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.