Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add eli-labz/Godcoder --skill post-merge-scangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eli-labz/GodcoderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eli-labz/godcoder/post-merge-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eli-labz/godcoder/post-merge-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eli-labz/godcoder/post-merge-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eli-labz/godcoder/post-merge-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eli-labz/godcoder/post-merge-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00234 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
post-merge-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 14483db03f69
post-merge-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository eli-labz/Godcoder (182 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 234 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.
agentbro-pr-merge
Use when reviewing, fixing CI for, approving workflows for, or merging AgentBro pull requests into dev/main, especially external contributor PRs where contributor attribution matters.
github-pr-workflow
Pull request lifecycle: create, review, merge, manage (gh CLI).
pull-request-author
Use when the user asks to prepare, update, audit, or submit a pull request. Inspect repository contribution rules, branch state, diff, tests, and the target base first; create a focused reviewable change description and do not commit, push, or open a hosted pull request without explicit authorization.
simplicio-orient
Terminal-first execution — answer facts with the shell, never with the LLM. Use whenever a step needs a fact about the filesystem, git, processes, or system resources, or runs a build/test/lint/diff whose output would flood context. Substitutes deterministic shell/CLI calls for native LLM operations and clamps their…
simplicio-review
Deep, adversarial branch review — parallel subagents on separate rubrics (security/correctness, code-quality, and does-it-reproduce), spawned in one message, then deduped into one verdict. Runs for EVERY item, no TRIVIAL/SMALL shortcut — it is 3 of the 6 roles in simplicio-tasks' minimum-agent floor. Use before…