cross-review

cross-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from EliasOulkadi/shokunin. It costs 101 tokens per session (1,983 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review assistant that sends a review to a specific AI model chosen by the user. It reconstructs the changes made during the current conversation and gathers related code before requesting the review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you explicitly ask for a review with a named model, such as reviewing changes with Opus, Sonnet, or Gemini.
Why use it?
It is for cases where the choice of review model matters and where the reviewer needs the full context around the changes. It avoids reviewing only isolated lines without their surrounding files.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions Codex; mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it when you explicitly ask for a review with a named model, such as reviewing changes with Opus, Sonnet, or Gemini.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add EliasOulkadi/shokunin --skill cross-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EliasOulkadi/shokunin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cross-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cross-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 101 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,983 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00101 $0.01983
Opus 5.5 $0.00040 $0.00793
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00397
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00198

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 6ebbbb0f527e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cross-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.pack/skills/cross-review/SKILL.md · 186 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reconstruct what you changed during this conversation, then delegate the actual review to a single subagent running the code-review skill with a user-specified model.

IMPORTANT: Steps 1-2 run in the current agent (the master). Only Step 3 spawns a subagent.

Workflow

Step 1: Parse the user request

Extract:

  • Model: The model ID from user's request. Validate against available models.
  • Review instructions: Any text after "Review instructions:" — pass verbatim.
  • Change scope: What should be reviewed. Default: all changes in this conversation.

Step 2: Gather context from your own changes

Reconstruct the diff from conversation history:

  1. Compose a unified diff of all changes (Edit, Write, Bash, etc.). Group by file.

    • If no changes: Inform user and stop.
  2. Read final state of changed files for surrounding context.

  3. Check related context:

    • Test files related to changed files (skip node_modules, .git, dist, build)
    • Config changes that affect behavior
    • Related type definitions or interfaces

Do NOT show gathered context to user. Use only for the subagent.

Step 3: Spawn the review subagent

spawn_subagent:
  skill: "code-review"
  model: <model from user request>
  prompt: |
    Review the changes below using "code-review" skill.

    CONSTRAINTS:
    - Read-only review. Do NOT edit files.
    - All context is provided below. Read files only if clearly incomplete.
    - Review independently and objectively.

    ## Review Instructions
    {user's review instructions, verbatim}

    ## Changes
    {reconstructed diff, grouped by file}

    ## Additional Context
    {links to related files, tests, type definitions, requirements}

Step 4: Relay the result — READ-ONLY, NO ACTIONS

CRITICAL: Output the subagent's review AS-IS. Do NOT:

  • Summarize, rephrase, reorder, or filter
  • Fix, improve, or refactor based on findings
  • Add your own commentary or caveats

One-line model attribution is acceptable. You may offer to implement recommendations, but let the user decide.

Read the full file on GitHub · 186 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 186 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 6ebbbb0f527e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cross-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EliasOulkadi/shokunin (112 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,983 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sast-sqli

Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic…

capture0x/YeepForge · 104 tokens

sast-businesslogic

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations…

capture0x/YeepForge · 110 tokens

sast-graphql

Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires…

capture0x/YeepForge · 123 tokens

sast-idor

Detect Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find candidates), batched verify (check authorization in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Checks endpoints for missing ownership or authorization checks on…

capture0x/YeepForge · 103 tokens

sast-ssrf

Detect Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find outbound call sites), batched verify (trace user input to destinations in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first).…

capture0x/YeepForge · 99 tokens

migration-review

Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.

rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch · 35 tokens