Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EliasOulkadi/shokunin --skill cross-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EliasOulkadi/shokuninWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/cross-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.01983 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
cross-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reconstruct what you changed during this conversation, then delegate the actual review to a single subagent running the code-review skill with a user-specified model.
IMPORTANT: Steps 1-2 run in the current agent (the master). Only Step 3 spawns a subagent.
Workflow
Step 1: Parse the user request
Extract:
- Model: The model ID from user's request. Validate against available models.
- Review instructions: Any text after "Review instructions:" — pass verbatim.
- Change scope: What should be reviewed. Default: all changes in this conversation.
Step 2: Gather context from your own changes
Reconstruct the diff from conversation history:
-
Compose a unified diff of all changes (Edit, Write, Bash, etc.). Group by file.
- If no changes: Inform user and stop.
-
Read final state of changed files for surrounding context.
-
Check related context:
- Test files related to changed files (skip
node_modules,.git,dist,build) - Config changes that affect behavior
- Related type definitions or interfaces
- Test files related to changed files (skip
Do NOT show gathered context to user. Use only for the subagent.
Step 3: Spawn the review subagent
spawn_subagent:
skill: "code-review"
model: <model from user request>
prompt: |
Review the changes below using "code-review" skill.
CONSTRAINTS:
- Read-only review. Do NOT edit files.
- All context is provided below. Read files only if clearly incomplete.
- Review independently and objectively.
## Review Instructions
{user's review instructions, verbatim}
## Changes
{reconstructed diff, grouped by file}
## Additional Context
{links to related files, tests, type definitions, requirements}
Step 4: Relay the result — READ-ONLY, NO ACTIONS
CRITICAL: Output the subagent's review AS-IS. Do NOT:
- Summarize, rephrase, reorder, or filter
- Fix, improve, or refactor based on findings
- Add your own commentary or caveats
One-line model attribution is acceptable. You may offer to implement recommendations, but let the user decide.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 186 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 6ebbbb0f527e
cross-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EliasOulkadi/shokunin (113 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,983 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-refactor
Refactor Python code to match this repo's coding standards and style. Use when the user asks to "refactor", "clean up", "fix coding standards", or "apply best practices" to a module, file, or directory in this repo. Applies python-best-practices, pydantic v2, pytorch-lightning, and python-docs conventions as relevant…
quality
PALADIN quality gatekeeper. Two-stage system: Stage 1 checks spec compliance (pass/fail, blocks everything on failure). Stage 2 scores project health 0-100 across 6 tiers. Issues verdict: SHIP IT / SHIP WITH CAUTION / NOT READY / BLOCKED. Evidence Before Claims: every finding must cite the file, line, and what was…
audit-artifact
Interactive workflow for auditing a SpecRoute artifact before it is treated as implementation-ready. Use when checking a PRD, spec triplet, prompt set, agent file, skill, command, hook, rule, or runtime layout. Asks which artifact path to inspect and which contract to apply. Triggers - "audit this artifact", "check…
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…