logging-monitoring-review

logging-monitoring-review is a skill for Codex from Eliyce/paqad-ai. It costs 30 tokens per session (905 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security review of application logs and alerts. It checks whether important events are recorded with useful context and whether logs avoid exposing sensitive data or accepting forged entries.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review logging for logins, password and MFA changes, denied access, financial actions, exports, administrator operations, and alert coverage.
Why use it?
Missing or unsafe logs make it harder to detect attacks, investigate incidents, and prove what happened.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Use it to review logging for logins, password and MFA changes, denied access, financial actions, exports, administrator operations, and alert coverage.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Eliyce/paqad-ai --skill logging-monitoring-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Eliyce/paqad-ai

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for logging-monitoring-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for logging-monitoring-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliyce/paqad-ai/logging-monitoring-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 905 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.00905
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00452
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00181
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00090

Measured 9d ago against content hash 42e3352a2df6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

logging-monitoring-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 2 executable files (scripts/lint-findings.sh, scripts/scan-log-smells.sh), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

runtime/capabilities/security/skills/logging-monitoring-review/SKILL.md · 75 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

What It Does

Reviews whether the application logs security-relevant events with sufficient context for incident detection and forensic analysis — and whether the logging itself is secure (no sensitive data in logs, no log injection surfaces). Maps to OWASP 2025 A09 — Security Logging and Alerting Failures.

Use This When

Use this when module docs describe authentication, authorization decisions, financial transactions, data exports, admin operations, or any high-value action that must be auditable for compliance or incident response.

Inputs

  • Read module docs to identify which operations are high-value and must be audited.
  • Read references/logging-gaps-checklist.md before evaluating each area.
  • Read logging configuration files (Laravel config/logging.php, Django LOGGING dict, Express winston/pino config) and test files.

Procedure

  1. Authentication event logging: Check whether failed and successful login attempts are logged with IP address, timestamp, and username (not password). Check that password changes, MFA enrollment/removal, and session invalidations are also logged.

  2. Authorization event logging: Check whether access denials (403 responses) are logged with the requested resource and caller identity. Check that privilege escalation attempts are detected and logged.

  3. Data modification logging: For each create/update/delete operation on sensitive models (users, payments, permissions, audit records themselves), verify an audit log entry is written with actor identity. Financial transaction audit trails must be append-only and tamper-resistant.

  4. Log integrity: Check whether logs can be tampered with by an application-level user (e.g., a normal user can delete their own activity logs). Check whether logs are stored on a separate system from the application server.

  5. Log injection: Check whether user-supplied input is written directly into log strings without sanitization. An attacker controlling a username or message field can:

    • Insert fake log entries by embedding newlines (\n) in the input
    • Inject ANSI escape codes to corrupt terminal-based log viewers
    • Corrupt structured JSON log format by embedding } or " characters

Read the full file on GitHub · 75 lines

Files

What ships with it

6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 75 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 42e3352a2df6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

logging-monitoring-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Eliyce/paqad-ai (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 905 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.