Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add emergent-wisdom/understanding-graph --skill quality-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emergent-wisdom/understanding-graphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/emergent-wisdom/understanding-graph/quality-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/emergent-wisdom/understanding-graph/quality-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/emergent-wisdom/understanding-graph/quality-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00739 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
quality-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quality Check
Use this skill deliberately, not on a timer. Do not interrupt useful work for scheduled maintenance, demand trigger diversity, or ask the user to repair the graph merely because a number is low.
Diagnose before changing
Choose the smallest view that answers the live question:
graph_analyze({ include: ["gaps", "bridges", "questions"] })for islands, bridges, and genuinely unanswered questions;graph_score()for a compact structural snapshot;graph_centrality()when influence or bottlenecks matter;graph_semantic_gaps()when embedding coverage exists and conceptual distance is relevant;graph_skeleton()only when the overall topology is itself in question;graph_thermostat()as an advisory entropy-style pulse, not a command.
Metrics describe the stored shape. They cannot establish truth, creativity, importance, completeness, or whether a node was worth creating. A sparse graph can be exactly right for a small task; a dense graph can still be confused.
Judge the finding in context
- A disconnected region is a problem only if the work gives it a real relation to another region. Do not invent a bridge.
- An unanswered question may remain intentionally open.
- A contradiction is live conflict, not proof that either side is false.
- A low supersession count is not evidence that someone failed to reconsider.
- Trigger counts are descriptive. Never add questions, tensions, predictions, or any other type to improve a distribution.
- Artifact-heavy structure is an advisory signal only. Add cognitive testimony only when genuine understanding, uncertainty, evidence, or choice exists.
When a finding could materially affect the task, use
graph_suggest_next({ task, workflow }) for concrete weighted routes or
graph_discover_grounded() for a bounded distant comparison. Choose, modify,
combine, or reject the result. “No defensible connection” and “no repair
needed” are valid outcomes.
Repair only what is real
If the diagnosis identifies a genuine issue, make the smallest truthful change:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 74 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 7d6a207d1475
quality-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository emergent-wisdom/understanding-graph (1 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 739 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
braindb
Memory recall and save. Use at every conversation start and whenever the user shares personal information, expertise, project context, preferences, or decisions worth remembering long-term.
braindb-agent
Persistent memory across sessions via the BrainDB agent. Use at conversation start and whenever you need to recall what you know about the user or save new information to long-term memory.
braindb-custom-profile
How to author a BrainDB custom profile — prompt add/replace fragments and an optional keyless ingestor — that shapes wiki naming/structure and feeds a custom ingestion source, with zero effect on defaults when inactive.
dev-browser
Browser automation with persistent page state. Use when users ask to navigate websites, fill forms, take screenshots, extract web data, test web apps, or automate browser workflows. Trigger phrases include "go to [url]", "click on", "fill out the form", "take a screenshot", "scrape", "automate", "test the website"…
harness-creator
Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is…
browserwing-admin
Manage and operate BrowserWing — an intelligent browser automation platform. Install dependencies, configure LLM, create/manage/execute automation scripts, use AI-driven exploration to generate scripts, browse the script marketplace, and troubleshoot issues.