Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/emre-guler/websec/open-redirectnpx skills add emre-guler/websec --skill open-redirectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emre-guler/websecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/emre-guler/websec/open-redirect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/emre-guler/websec/open-redirect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/emre-guler/websec/open-redirect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00094 | $0.07111 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.03556 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01422 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00711 |
Grade A, and why
open-redirect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Open Redirect Detection
Overview
An open redirect exists when the destination of a server-issued navigation is influenced by the incoming request and is not constrained to the application's own origin. The application answers with a 3xx and a Location header (or a meta refresh, or a server-rendered script assignment) pointing wherever the request asked it to point. The attacker is remote and unauthenticated: they craft a link on the real domain, with the real certificate, and let the victim's own browser carry them to attacker-controlled ground. The gain is rarely the navigation itself — it is what rides along. A redirect on a trusted domain is a phishing primitive that survives link filters and user inspection, and an exfiltration channel for anything the redirecting URL carries (an authorization code, an access token, a session identifier, a reset nonce) — in the forwarded query string, or in the Referer the browser attaches to the attacker's page. This skill finds such redirects by locating every site where a redirect destination is assembled from request data, verifying each one in parallel, and merging the results into <output_dir>/open-redirect-results.md.
What it is NOT
- Client-side navigation from a client-side source (
/websec:dom-based): script readslocation.search,location.hash,document.referrer,window.name, or an inbound message and assigns it tolocation,location.href,location.assign(),location.replace(), orwindow.open(). Test: does the server emit the destination (in aLocationheader, a rendered<meta http-equiv="refresh">, or a value the server interpolated into the page), or does script read it from the URL and assign it without the server ever seeing it? Server emits → here. Script reads and assigns → sibling. A fragment-only source never reaches the server, so it is always the sibling's. - Server-side request forgery (
/websec:ssrf): the server itself dereferences the supplied URL. Test: who makes the request to the attacker's destination — the victim's browser (this skill) or the application's own HTTP client (sibling)? Anextvalue fetched server-side to render a preview is SSRF; the same value returned as aLocationis this class. - Host-header driven URLs (
/websec:host-header): the destination's host comes fromHost,X-Forwarded-Host,X-Forwarded-Proto, or a similar incoming header rather than from a parameter, body field, or stored return target. Test: which request element supplies the host — a header (sibling) or a value the application treats as an application-level parameter (here)? Absolute URLs built fromreq.hostnameor$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']belong to the sibling even when the path comes from a parameter. - Authorization-server redirect URI validation (
/websec:oauth): aredirect_urimatched by a provider against a set registered for a client. Test: is the check the provider'sredirect_urimatching against registered values, or the application's own return-URL handling on an ordinary route? A loose match on the provider is the sibling's finding; an ordinary open redirect that happens to sit on a host registered as a callback is this skill's finding, with the token-theft consequence recorded in Impact. - Script execution in the victim's origin (
/websec:xss): ajavascript:ordata:destination that the browser executes rather than navigates to. Test: does the payload execute script in the application's origin, or does it only move the browser elsewhere? Report the missing scheme restriction here, note the escalation in Impact, and hand the execution finding to the sibling under "Also observed". - Cross-site request to a state-changing endpoint (
/websec:csrf): arriving at an endpoint cross-site and having it act is that class. Being bounced to an attacker's site after the endpoint runs is this one. The two chain — a state-changing GET with anextparameter is often both — but each is judged by its own owner. - Not a finding: a destination selected from a fixed map or enum where the request only supplies a key; a value that, after normalisation, is a relative path with no scheme, no authority, and no protocol-relative or backslash-authority form; a redirect to a constant or to a route generated from a fixed route name; an outbound-link interstitial that is intentionally public, carries no credential, token, or
Refererfrom an authenticated page, and does not claim to validate its target.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 193 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 158db5088ed4
open-redirect is a skill published in the GitHub repository emre-guler/websec (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 7,111 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ponytail-sec-audit
Full project security audit. Scans the entire codebase across three passes: code that shouldn't exist, all dependencies assessed, all hardening findings. Produces a comprehensive numbered report with blast-radius narrative. Persists findings to .ponytail-sec/ for cross-scan tracking. For per-diff review use…
ponytail-sec
Security companion for active development. Scopes to the current diff or changed files. Three passes: YAGNI code review, new-dep assessment, and up to 3 material hardening findings. Lean by design — surfaces the one thing to fix before merging, not a backlog. Use ponytail-sec-audit for a full project scan.
dockerfile
Binary Dockerfile image-build hardening check. Use when reviewing Dockerfiles, container image builds, multi-stage builds, runtime users, pinned bases, or reproducible dependency installs. Minimal output only: OK or NOTOK: RULE, RULE.
k8s-securitycontext
Binary Kubernetes securityContext hardening check. Use when reviewing Pods, Deployments, StatefulSets, DaemonSets, Jobs, CronJobs, Helm templates, or Kubernetes manifests that define containers. Minimal output only: OK or NOTOK: RULE, RULE.
Mixed-Language Monorepos
This skill should be used when the user is auditing a "polyglot monorepo", "multi-language codebase", "microservices with different languages", "Go + Python + TypeScript", or any codebase with services written in different programming languages. Provides strategies for cross-service security analysis and unified…
OWASP API Security Top 10
This skill should be used when the user asks about "API security", "OWASP API Top 10", "BOLA", "broken object level authorization", "API authentication", "mass assignment", "GraphQL security", "gRPC security", "rate limiting", "API abuse", "REST API vulnerabilities", or needs to identify API-specific security issues…