coverage

A coverage checker for a security assessment, showing which vulnerability types have and have not been tested on each asset.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review an engagement plan, find untested vulnerability classes, choose the next test, and record completed checks.
Why use it?
It prevents unfinished testing from being mistaken for complete coverage and highlights gaps that still need work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/encod3d-sec/torch/coverage
Any agent
npx skills add Encod3d-Sec/TORCH --skill coverage
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Encod3d-Sec/TORCH

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 49 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 498 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00049 $0.00498
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.00249
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00100
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00050

Measured 2d ago against content hash ca3ecd413764, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/workflow/coverage/SKILL.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

Coverage

Systematic thoroughness: which phase items and applicable vuln classes have NOT been done. Coverage now lives in the plan board (targets/<eng>/Approach.md), not a separate file.

Read the board

cat targets/<active>/Approach.md
python3 scripts/next_move.py      # ranks [gap] test moves from the 4a table + findings + Deadends
  • Phase items still [ ] (todo) or [~] (doing) are the open work, in kill-chain order.
  • The ### 4a table is the per-asset coverage matrix: one row per (asset, vuln class); a row counts as tested when its status cell is [x]/done. Any applicable class with no done row on an in-scope asset is a gap. next_move.py surfaces these as [gap] moves.

Then (model)

  1. For each asset, the untested applicable classes ARE the to-do. Prioritise by impact + the [gap]/[now] moves from next_move.py (fingerprint-targeted).
  2. Pull payloads from wiki/payloads/<class> for each untested class (or Skill(arsenal)).
  3. After testing a class on an asset, add a ### 4a row to Approach.md with the class, the tool/payload, status [x], and the poc/ image (GATE 2). Otherwise the gap recurs.
  4. A phase is done only when every applicable item is [x] or [-] (n/a) or [!] (deadend).

Discipline

  • Respect scope: out-of-scope assets are excluded by next_move.py.
  • "Done" means tested, not necessarily clean - record findings separately as FINDs.
  • Don't mark a row [x] without actually testing it and capturing a poc/ image; this checklist only helps if honest.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 34 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A ca3ecd413764

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository Encod3d-Sec/TORCH (282 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 498 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

agent-host-chat-contributions

Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.

microsoft/vscode · 56 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens