Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graph. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graph/main/.claude/skills/c2pa-kg/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graph/c2pa-kg)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graph/c2pa-kg"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graph/c2pa-kg.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01183 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00592 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
c2pa-kg scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C2PA Knowledge Graph Query
You have access to a machine-readable knowledge graph derived from the C2PA specification. Use it to answer questions about C2PA data structures, validation rules, and version changes with precision rather than relying on training data.
Data sources
The knowledge graph is generated from the C2PA specs-core repository and stored as JSON artifacts. Check for pre-generated artifacts in this order:
- MCP tools (if c2pa-knowledge-graph MCP server is running): use
query_entity,query_validation_rules,diff_versions, orsearch_entitiestools directly. - Local artifacts: look for
output/<version>/metadata.jsonin the c2pa-knowledge-graph repo directory. If found, read and parse the JSON. - Generate on demand: if no artifacts exist and the user has specs-core cloned locally,
run
uv run c2pa-kg generate --spec-source <path> --version <version> --output-dir ./output.
How to answer queries
Entity lookup
When asked about a C2PA entity (e.g., "what properties does a Claim have?"):
- Load
metadata.jsonfor the requested version (default: latest, currently 2.4). - Look up the entity in the
entitiesdict. Entity names are CamelCase (e.g.,ClaimMap,ClaimMapV2,ActionItemsMap,IngredientMapV3). - Report the entity's properties (name, type, required, cardinality, description), relationships (target entity, relationship type), and whether it is deprecated.
- If the entity name is ambiguous, search across all entity names and suggest matches.
Validation rules
When asked about validation requirements:
- Load validation rules from
metadata.json->validation_rules. - Filter by phase if specified:
structural,cryptographic,trust,semantic,assertion,ingredient,timestamp,signature,content. - Report rules with their severity (must/shall/should/may), description, and referenced entities.
- Cross-reference with status codes from
status_codeswhen relevant.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 103 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 0d35d4972db1
c2pa-kg is a skill published in the GitHub repository encypherai/c2pa-knowledge-graph (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,183 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…