Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents --skill hybrid-search-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hybrid-search-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hybrid-search-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hybrid-search-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hybrid-search-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hybrid-search-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.03817 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01527 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00763 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00382 |
Grade A, and why
hybrid-search-implementation scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
results = await conn.fetch(f""" This is a copy
83% identical to hybrid-search-implementation — 530 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 569 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hybrid Search Implementation
Patterns for combining vector similarity and keyword-based search.
When to Use This Skill
- Building RAG systems with improved recall
- Combining semantic understanding with exact matching
- Handling queries with specific terms (names, codes)
- Improving search for domain-specific vocabulary
- When pure vector search misses keyword matches
Core Concepts
1. Hybrid Search Architecture
Query → ┬─► Vector Search ──► Candidates ─┐
│ │
└─► Keyword Search ─► Candidates ─┴─► Fusion ─► Results
2. Fusion Methods
| Method | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| RRF | Reciprocal Rank Fusion | General purpose |
| Linear | Weighted sum of scores | Tunable balance |
| Cross-encoder | Rerank with neural model | Highest quality |
| Cascade | Filter then rerank | Efficiency |
Templates
Template 1: Reciprocal Rank Fusion
from typing import List, Dict, Tuple
from collections import defaultdict
def reciprocal_rank_fusion(
result_lists: List[List[Tuple[str, float]]],
k: int = 60,
weights: List[float] = None
) -> List[Tuple[str, float]]:
"""
Combine multiple ranked lists using RRF.
Args:
result_lists: List of (doc_id, score) tuples per search method
k: RRF constant (higher = more weight to lower ranks)
weights: Optional weights per result list
Returns:
Fused ranking as (doc_id, score) tuples
"""
if weights is None:
weights = [1.0] * len(result_lists)
scores = defaultdict(float)
for result_list, weight in zip(result_lists, weights):
for rank, (doc_id, _) in enumerate(result_list):
# RRF formula: 1 / (k + rank)
scores[doc_id] += weight * (1.0 / (k + rank + 1))
# Sort by fused score
return sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
def linear_combination(
vector_results: List[Tuple[str, float]],
keyword_results: List[Tuple[str, float]],
alpha: float = 0.5
) -> List[Tuple[str, float]]:
"""
Combine results with linear interpolation.
Args:
vector_results: (doc_id, similarity_score) from vector search
keyword_results: (doc_id, bm25_score) from keyword search
alpha: Weight for vector search (1-alpha for keyword)
"""
# Normalize scores to [0, 1]
def normalize(results):
if not results:
return {}
scores = [s for _, s in results]
min_s, max_s = min(scores), max(scores)
range_s = max_s - min_s if max_s != min_s else 1
return {doc_id: (score - min_s) / range_s for doc_id, score in results}
vector_scores = normalize(vector_results)
keyword_scores = normalize(keyword_results)
# Combine
all_docs = set(vector_scores.keys()) | set(keyword_scores.keys())
combined = {}
for doc_id in all_docs:
v_score = vector_scores.get(doc_id, 0)
k_score = keyword_scores.get(doc_id, 0)
combined[doc_id] = alpha * v_score + (1 - alpha) * k_score
return sorted(combined.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 569 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 8650318071d5
hybrid-search-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents (4 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 3,817 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 83% identical to hybrid-search-implementation, differing in 530 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
azure-search-documents-dotnet
Azure AI Search SDK for .NET (Azure.Search.Documents). Use for building search applications with full-text, vector, semantic, and hybrid search. Covers SearchClient (queries, document CRUD), SearchIndexClient (index management), and SearchIndexerClient (indexers, skillsets). Triggers: "Azure Search .NET"…
azure-search-documents-ts
Build search applications using Azure AI Search SDK for JavaScript (@azure/search-documents). Use when creating/managing indexes, implementing vector/hybrid search, semantic ranking, or building agentic retrieval with knowledge bases.
convex-agent
Add an AI agent / RAG backend (@convex-dev/agent) to the Convex app.
wegent-knowledge
Knowledge base management and search tools for Wegent. Provides capabilities to list, create, update, and search knowledge bases and documents using RAG retrieval. Use this skill when the user wants to manage knowledge bases, documents, or search for information programmatically.
azure-search-documents-py
Full-text, vector, and hybrid search with AI enrichment capabilities.
rag-web-fallback
Only reach for external web search when the local corpus comes back empty or clearly insufficient. Forces the agent to try knowledge-rag first, then explicitly document why it needed to escalate. Prevents wasted API cost, latency, and (in air-gapped deployments) accidental network calls.