llm-evaluation

llm-evaluation is a skill for Claude Code from EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents. It costs 40 tokens per session (3,140 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of llm-evaluation, MIT.

A guide to evaluating AI applications with automated scores, human feedback, benchmarks, and comparisons over time.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare models or prompts, assess text generation and retrieval, run A/B tests, establish baselines, and monitor AI quality.
Why use it?
It helps reveal quality problems, measure whether changes improve results, and catch performance regressions before release.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the llm-application-dev plugin — 8 skills shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/llm-evaluation
Any agent
npx skills add EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents --skill llm-evaluation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install llm-application-dev, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 8 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for llm-evaluation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/llm-evaluation.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/llm-evaluation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/llm-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/llm-evaluation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,140 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.03140
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.01570
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00628
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00314

Measured 2d ago against content hash b37039b062cd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

llm-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to llm-evaluation — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/llm-evaluation/SKILL.md · 472 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 472 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

LLM Evaluation

Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.

When to Use This Skill

  • Measuring LLM application performance systematically
  • Comparing different models or prompts
  • Detecting performance regressions before deployment
  • Validating improvements from prompt changes
  • Building confidence in production systems
  • Establishing baselines and tracking progress over time
  • Debugging unexpected model behavior

Core Evaluation Types

1. Automated Metrics

Fast, repeatable, scalable evaluation using computed scores.

Text Generation:

  • BLEU: N-gram overlap (translation)
  • ROUGE: Recall-oriented (summarization)
  • METEOR: Semantic similarity
  • BERTScore: Embedding-based similarity
  • Perplexity: Language model confidence

Classification:

  • Accuracy: Percentage correct
  • Precision/Recall/F1: Class-specific performance
  • Confusion Matrix: Error patterns
  • AUC-ROC: Ranking quality

Retrieval (RAG):

  • MRR: Mean Reciprocal Rank
  • NDCG: Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain
  • Precision@K: Relevant in top K
  • Recall@K: Coverage in top K

2. Human Evaluation

Manual assessment for quality aspects difficult to automate.

Dimensions:

  • Accuracy: Factual correctness
  • Coherence: Logical flow
  • Relevance: Answers the question
  • Fluency: Natural language quality
  • Safety: No harmful content
  • Helpfulness: Useful to the user

3. LLM-as-Judge

Use stronger LLMs to evaluate weaker model outputs.

Approaches:

  • Pointwise: Score individual responses
  • Pairwise: Compare two responses
  • Reference-based: Compare to gold standard
  • Reference-free: Judge without ground truth

Quick Start

from llm_eval import EvaluationSuite, Metric

# Define evaluation suite
suite = EvaluationSuite([
    Metric.accuracy(),
    Metric.bleu(),
    Metric.bertscore(),
    Metric.custom(name="groundedness", fn=check_groundedness)
])

# Prepare test cases
test_cases = [
    {
        "input": "What is the capital of France?",
        "expected": "Paris",
        "context": "France is a country in Europe. Paris is its capital."
    },
    # ... more test cases
]

# Run evaluation
results = suite.evaluate(
    model=your_model,
    test_cases=test_cases
)

print(f"Overall Accuracy: {results.metrics['accuracy']}")
print(f"BLEU Score: {results.metrics['bleu']}")

Read the full file on GitHub · 472 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 472 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b37039b062cd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

llm-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,140 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to llm-evaluation, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

agent-platform-rag-engine-management

Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…

google/skills · 85 tokens

agent-platform-model-registry

Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.

google/skills · 60 tokens

foundry-config-setup

Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.

microsoft/agent-framework · 65 tokens

google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog

Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…

google/skills · 138 tokens

training-check

Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 35 tokens

nemo-automodel-launcher-config

Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.

NVIDIA/skills · 30 tokens