Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/solidity-securitynpx skills add EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents --skill solidity-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agentsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.03207 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01604 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00641 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00321 |
Grade A, and why
solidity-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to solidity-security — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 508 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Solidity Security
Master smart contract security best practices, vulnerability prevention, and secure Solidity development patterns.
When to Use This Skill
- Writing secure smart contracts
- Auditing existing contracts for vulnerabilities
- Implementing secure DeFi protocols
- Preventing reentrancy, overflow, and access control issues
- Optimizing gas usage while maintaining security
- Preparing contracts for professional audits
- Understanding common attack vectors
Critical Vulnerabilities
1. Reentrancy
Attacker calls back into your contract before state is updated.
Vulnerable Code:
// VULNERABLE TO REENTRANCY
contract VulnerableBank {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw() public {
uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender];
// DANGER: External call before state update
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success);
balances[msg.sender] = 0; // Too late!
}
}
Secure Pattern (Checks-Effects-Interactions):
contract SecureBank {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw() public {
uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender];
require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance");
// EFFECTS: Update state BEFORE external call
balances[msg.sender] = 0;
// INTERACTIONS: External call last
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");
}
}
Alternative: ReentrancyGuard
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
contract SecureBank is ReentrancyGuard {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw() public nonReentrant {
uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender];
require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance");
balances[msg.sender] = 0;
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 508 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 5b13567dd73e
solidity-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 3,207 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to solidity-security, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.