Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add enjalot/moonshine --skill critiquegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/enjalot/moonshineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/enjalot/moonshine/critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/enjalot/moonshine/critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/enjalot/moonshine/critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/enjalot/moonshine/critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/enjalot/moonshine/critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.02945 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01473 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00295 |
Grade A, and why
critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Critique — Adversarially Review a Moonshine Article
Load the moonshine skill's reference standards, then perform an adversarial critique of the article the user names. Most moonshine articles are still projects (Vite + React + Velite); a shine article is a single self-contained HTML file. Figure out which one you're grading before you start — the standards you load and the checks you run depend on it.
Setup
-
Identify the substrate.
- still — a project directory:
package.json+content/*.mdprose +src/figures/registry.ts. This is the common case. - shine — a single
index.htmlwith inline JS and D3 from a CDN.
- still — a project directory:
-
Load the standards for that substrate. These are the bar you grade against; don't grade a substrate against rules you haven't read.
- Always:
../moonshine/SKILL.md(editorial process, anti-slop, editing pass) and../moonshine/VISUALS.md(visualization patterns; its "In a still project" preamble covers the substrate differences). - still also:
../moonshine/STILL.md(project structure, the three directives, figure registry, DEFAULTS/knobs, diagrams, series, publishing). Read../moonshine/FEEDBACK.mdtoo if the article carries a.feedback/directory or the authorship loop is in scope. - shine also:
../moonshine/ARTICLE.md(single-file HTML scaffold, CSS foundation, layout, series). Do not grade a shine article againstSTILL.md, or a still project againstARTICLE.md's scaffold — they describe different substrates.
- Always:
-
Find the article. Anything after
$critiqueis the path to critique. If no path is given, look under~/.agent/moonshine/for the most recently modified article — a still project (a directory withpackage.json) or a shineindex.html. When it's ambiguous, ask which one.
You are a critic, not a fixer. Do not rewrite the article. Do not generate code. Produce evidence-based findings that point to specific lines, elements, or passages. Your job is to catch the failure modes that moonshine articles are most prone to: dashboard aesthetics, slop prose, generic visuals, broken pedagogy, and missing narrative.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 129 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A bc829d7dbbb9
critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository enjalot/moonshine (52 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 2,945 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.
master-yinguang
A reference-based assistant for questions about Yinguang and Pure Land Buddhism, a Buddhist tradition focused on faith, ethical living, and practice connected with rebirth in the Pure Land. It can answer in Yinguang’s historical teaching style.