Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add enola-labs/enola --skill enolagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/enola-labs/enolaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/enola-labs/enola/enola)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/enola-labs/enola/enola"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/enola-labs/enola/enola/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/enola-labs/enola/enola"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/enola-labs/enola/enola.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00511 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
enola scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Enola — architecture before and after a change
Enola serves a deterministic structural map over MCP: modules, symbols, routes, storage, and the relationships between them. Use its tools for architectural questions instead of reconstructing the same information through broad file searches.
Before changing code whose blast radius is unclear:
- Use
impact_analysisto find transitive dependents. - Use
explore,traverse, orfind_pathto understand how code is wired. - Use
set_baselineonce, before editing, if the session hook has not pinned one. - Use
find_orphansbefore adding more callers to apparently unused symbols. - Use
package_metricsfor package-boundary decisions. - Use
analyze_performancefor structural performance risks.
After a structural change, use generate_snapshot and diff_snapshot to inspect
what moved: findings introduced or resolved, coupling added, and symbols added or
removed.
The gate: enola check
enola check is an important part of the workflow. The MCP tools help an agent
understand and inspect a change; enola check is the CLI and CI quality gate with a
stable exit-code contract. Run it after making structural changes and before reporting
the work complete:
enola check
A bare enola check reports the delta but intentionally fails nothing. A repository
that wants enforcement must name its policy, for example:
enola check --fail-on=layers
Do not add or change enforcement flags on the user's behalf. Use the policy already declared by the repository or ask the user which rules should gate the build.
Enola reports movement from a pinned baseline, not every existing problem. A finding that no policy enforced is evidence to show the user, not authorization to revert or refactor unrelated code. Do not describe a change as architecturally clean when the check could not run or its baseline was not comparable.
If the enola executable is missing, explain that this plugin requires the Enola CLI
on PATH, point the user to the repository installation instructions, and verify the
installation with enola doctor. Never install or upgrade the executable without the
user's approval.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago First seen · 55 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 510753920fc2
enola is a skill published in the GitHub repository enola-labs/enola (257 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 511 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
issue-root-resolution
Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.
rdd-defect-workflow
Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.
lsp-inspect
Full code quality audit for a file, package, or directory. Supports batch mode (directory walk with --top ranking), comparison mode (--diff for branch-only issues), severity calibration by blast radius, fix suggestions, and confidence tiers. Applies a check taxonomy (dead symbols, silent failures, error wrapping…
lsp-dead-code
Enumerate exported symbols in a file and surface those with zero references across the workspace. Use when auditing for dead code, cleaning up APIs, or checking which exports are safe to remove.
lsp-impact
Blast-radius analysis for a symbol or file — shows all callers, type supertypes/subtypes, and reference count before you change it. Use when refactoring, deleting, or changing the signature of any function, type, or method. Also accepts a file path to surface all exported-symbol impact in one shot.