Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add epicsagas/epic-harness --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/epicsagas/epic-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00630 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00252 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit — Conventional Commits Generator
When to Trigger
- User wants to commit, save, or check in changes
- User asks to commit after completing a task
- Code changes are ready and user signals completion
Process
-
Gather context — run in parallel:
git status— see what changedgit diff HEAD— see the actual diffgit log --oneline -5— match existing commit style
-
Determine type:
Type When featNew feature or capability fixBug fix refactorCode change, no behavior change docsDocumentation only testAdding or correcting tests buildBuild system or dependencies choreMaintenance task ciCI/CD configuration styleFormatting, whitespace perfPerformance improvement -
Generate message:
type(scope): description- Lowercase type, optional scope
- Imperative mood, no period, under 72 chars
- Breaking changes: append
!before: - Body only when diff needs extra context (max 3 bullet points)
-
Stage and commit:
git add <specific files>— prefer explicit files overgit add -Agit commit -m "type(scope): description"- Execute automatically — no confirmation needed
Anti-Rationalization
| Excuse | Rebuttal | What to do instead |
|---|---|---|
| "I'll just use a generic message" | Generic messages make git history useless. | Spend 5 seconds analyzing the diff — the type and scope are obvious from the changes. |
| "The user didn't specify a format" | Conventional Commits is the project standard — guard will block non-CC messages anyway. | Always generate CC format. |
| "I'll commit everything together" | Unrelated changes in one commit make bisect and revert impossible. | If changes span multiple concerns, suggest splitting first. |
Evidence Required
-
git statuschecked before staging - Only relevant files staged (not
git add -Ablindly) - Message follows
type(scope): descriptionformat - Type accurately reflects the change (feat ≠ fix ≠ refactor)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A f95270a92f92
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository epicsagas/epic-harness (18 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
git
Run git version control commands for repository management. Use when the user asks to check status, view history or diffs, stage and commit changes, manage branches, merge or rebase, work with remotes, stash changes, tag releases, cherry-pick commits, bisect regressions, resolve conflicts, manage worktrees or…
knowledge-shell-process-and-worktree
Shell and Git worktree support for running commands, managing long-lived processes, and giving sessions isolated working directories. A Git worktree is a separate checkout linked to the same repository.
datalad
Retrieve, version, and publish scientific datasets with DataLad and git-annex, and capture computational provenance with datalad run, rerun, and containers-run. Use when cloning or fetching data from OpenNeuro, DANDI, datasets.datalad.org, or any DataLad dataset; when a file in a dataset reads as a broken symlink or a…
commit
Use when asked to commit, "commit this", "/commit", or to write a commit for the pending change — reviews what the change reaches outside its diff first, then commits with a message that names it.
pr-writer
Writes a pull-request description from the actual diff.
conventional-commits
Write precise Conventional Commits messages from the actual staged diff. Use whenever committing code or asked to write/fix a commit message.