Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add epicsagas/epic-harness --skill perfgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/epicsagas/epic-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00922 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
perf scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Perf — Performance Review
Process
- Identify performance-sensitive code paths from the diff (loops, queries, rendering, batch ops)
- Run the Checklist below, marking each item as pass, fail, or N/A with reason
- For each failure, cite the file and line number with a one-line fix hint
- Report findings using the Evidence Required section
When to Trigger
- Database queries inside loops
- Large data set processing
- Rendering or UI update logic
- API endpoint that could receive high traffic
- File I/O in hot paths
Checklist
Database
- No N+1 queries (use JOIN, eager loading, or batch) — N+1 queries cause latency to scale linearly with row count, turning a 1ms query into seconds under load.
- Indexes exist for frequently queried columns — without indexes, the database performs full table scans, collapsing read throughput.
- Pagination for large result sets — fetching all rows at once exhausts memory and increases response time for every consumer.
- Connection pooling configured — opening a new connection per request adds network round-trip overhead and can exhaust database connection limits.
Memory
- No unbounded arrays or caches growing indefinitely — unbounded growth causes gradual memory exhaustion and eventual OOM kills with no warning.
- Event listeners properly removed / unsubscribed — leaked listeners hold references to their context, preventing garbage collection of entire object graphs.
- Large objects released after use — holding references to large payloads keeps them in the heap, increasing GC pressure and pause times.
- Streams used for large file processing (not loading entire file) — loading a multi-GB file into RAM blocks other allocations and risks crashing the process.
Computation
- Expensive calculations memoized where appropriate — recomputing pure results on every call wastes CPU cycles that compound in hot paths.
- No redundant re-renders (React: useMemo, useCallback) — unnecessary re-renders cascade through the component tree, causing layout thrash and dropped frames.
- Async operations don't block the main thread — blocking the main thread stalls all concurrent requests, degrading throughput for every user.
- Debounce/throttle on frequent events (scroll, input) — unthrottled handlers fire hundreds of times per second, overwhelming the event loop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 07ff451e9024
perf is a skill published in the GitHub repository epicsagas/epic-harness (20 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 922 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
impact
Use when asked what a change could break or affect, "is this safe to commit/push/merge?", "what does this break?", or before committing a multi-file change — the callers outside the diff, the tests guarding them, and the contracts the change crosses.
sephera-change-safety
Use Sephera to keep a code change safe: check a file's blast radius before editing it, re-check every file the change touches, review the change before committing, fix breaks by following their suggestion, and gate the merge on breaking symbols that still have consumers. Trigger this skill when editing, reviewing, or…
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…
hypotheses
Turns a research direction into testable hypotheses with predictions, competing explanations and the experiments that discriminate between them, including the design (controls, randomization, blocking), sample size or seed count, the pre-specified analysis, and the result that would falsify each hypothesis. Use when a…
smiles-validation
Strict SMILES validation, structural comparison, and modification verification. Catches invalid LLM-generated molecules.