Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perfnpx skills add epicsagas/epic-harness --skill perfgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/epicsagas/epic-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/epicsagas/epic-harness/perf.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00922 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00461 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
perf scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Perf — Performance Review
Process
- Identify performance-sensitive code paths from the diff (loops, queries, rendering, batch ops)
- Run the Checklist below, marking each item as pass, fail, or N/A with reason
- For each failure, cite the file and line number with a one-line fix hint
- Report findings using the Evidence Required section
When to Trigger
- Database queries inside loops
- Large data set processing
- Rendering or UI update logic
- API endpoint that could receive high traffic
- File I/O in hot paths
Checklist
Database
- No N+1 queries (use JOIN, eager loading, or batch) — N+1 queries cause latency to scale linearly with row count, turning a 1ms query into seconds under load.
- Indexes exist for frequently queried columns — without indexes, the database performs full table scans, collapsing read throughput.
- Pagination for large result sets — fetching all rows at once exhausts memory and increases response time for every consumer.
- Connection pooling configured — opening a new connection per request adds network round-trip overhead and can exhaust database connection limits.
Memory
- No unbounded arrays or caches growing indefinitely — unbounded growth causes gradual memory exhaustion and eventual OOM kills with no warning.
- Event listeners properly removed / unsubscribed — leaked listeners hold references to their context, preventing garbage collection of entire object graphs.
- Large objects released after use — holding references to large payloads keeps them in the heap, increasing GC pressure and pause times.
- Streams used for large file processing (not loading entire file) — loading a multi-GB file into RAM blocks other allocations and risks crashing the process.
Computation
- Expensive calculations memoized where appropriate — recomputing pure results on every call wastes CPU cycles that compound in hot paths.
- No redundant re-renders (React: useMemo, useCallback) — unnecessary re-renders cascade through the component tree, causing layout thrash and dropped frames.
- Async operations don't block the main thread — blocking the main thread stalls all concurrent requests, degrading throughput for every user.
- Debounce/throttle on frequent events (scroll, input) — unthrottled handlers fire hundreds of times per second, overwhelming the event loop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 73 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 07ff451e9024
perf is a skill published in the GitHub repository epicsagas/epic-harness (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 922 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
duckduckgo-search
Free keyless web, news, and image search via ddgs.
subagent-driven-development
Execute plans via delegatetask subagents (2-stage review).
mcporter
List, auth, and call MCP servers/tools from the terminal.
article-writing
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
mem0-oss-to-platform
Plan and then execute a migration of a project from the mem0 open-source / self-hosted SDK (the local Memory class) to the mem0 Platform / hosted / managed SDK (the MemoryClient class). Use this whenever a developer wants to move, switch, or migrate their mem0 usage off OSS/self-hosted to the hosted API — e.g.…
complete-partial-pr
Evaluate and complete an issue or PR where the submitted patch fixes only a narrow symptom of the reported pain point. Use when a contribution may miss adjacent integration surfaces, provider/spec semantics, roundtrip behavior, tests, docs, or historical maintainer decisions.