Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add equinor/neqsim-community-skills --skill neqsim-seabed-protection-screeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsim-community-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-seabed-protection-screening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-seabed-protection-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-seabed-protection-screening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-seabed-protection-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-seabed-protection-screening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00160 | $0.03788 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.01515 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00758 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00379 |
Grade A, and why
neqsim-seabed-protection-screening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 265 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Seabed Protection Screening: Trenching, Burial and Rock Dump
A flowline or export pipeline is rarely just laid on the seabed. Where trawl gear, anchors, dropped objects, ice keels or upheaval buckling threaten it, the line is trenched, buried, rock-covered or supported, and that decision moves three things the rest of a study depends on: the schedule (trenching rate, not lay rate, often sets the offshore duration), the cost and rock tonnage, and the thermal behaviour of the line - a buried line cools down much more slowly than an exposed one, so hydrate margin and no-touch time change with the burial state.
This skill makes that scope visible early. It samples public or project map layers along the route, assigns a hazard-driven cover requirement per segment, decides whether the soil allows trenching or forces a rock dump, sizes the rock, and hands the resulting burial state to NeqSim thermal and cooldown models. Every default is a recorded placeholder, and every missing input is a reported data gap.
It is a screening tool. It does not perform a trawl interference, upheaval buckling, free-span, on-bottom stability or pipe-soil assessment; those are the downstream standards listed under References.
When to Use
- A tie-back, export line or SURF study needs a first estimate of trenching and rock-dump scope along a route.
- A map layer (seabed substrate, vessel or fishing density, ice scour, protected area, existing pipelines) should decide where protection is needed.
- Crossings of existing pipelines and cables need rock quantities.
- Free-span candidates from survey processing need support quantities.
- A cooldown or hydrate-margin study must reflect which parts of the line are buried, rock-covered or exposed.
- Two routes or burial philosophies (trench everywhere versus rock only at crossings) are compared on trench length, rock tonnes and days.
When Not to Use
- As a trawl-gear interaction, upheaval-buckling, free-span, stability or pipe-soil assessment. It supplies geometry and quantities, not code checks.
- To select a trenching contractor or tool. Capability and rates are placeholders.
- As a geotechnical interpretation. Surface substrate classes are not a strength profile and not a trenchability statement.
- For pre-lay route survey, boulder clearance or shore-approach design.
- On confidential layers in a public workspace. Inputs must be public, synthetic or approved for open-source use; enterprise map access belongs to the enterprise workflow.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/basic_seabed_protection_screening.py 2.7 KB runs code
- pyproject.toml 611 B
- README.md 1.0 KB
- src/seabed_protection_screening/__init__.py 1.3 KB runs code
- src/seabed_protection_screening/mapdata.py 18 KB runs code
- src/seabed_protection_screening/protection.py 27 KB runs code
- tests/test_seabed_protection_screening.py 11 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 265 lines · 160 tokens per session scan A 3faf49111aab
neqsim-seabed-protection-screening is a skill published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim-community-skills (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 160 tokens to every session and 3,788 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
neqsim-seabed-protection-screening compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| neqsim-seabed-protection-screeningequinor/neqsim-community-skills | Skill | 4 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 160 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |