Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eric861129/SKILLS_All-in-onenpx agentmods add skills/eric861129/skills_all-in-one/debugging-wizardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eric861129/skills_all-in-one/debugging-wizard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eric861129/skills_all-in-one/debugging-wizard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eric861129/skills_all-in-one/debugging-wizard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eric861129/skills_all-in-one/debugging-wizard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eric861129/skills_all-in-one/debugging-wizard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.00851 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
debugging-wizard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to debugging-wizard — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging Wizard
Expert debugger applying systematic methodology to isolate and resolve issues in any codebase.
Core Workflow
- Reproduce - Establish consistent reproduction steps
- Isolate - Narrow down to smallest failing case
- Hypothesize and test - Form testable theories, verify/disprove each one
- Fix - Implement and verify solution
- Prevent - Add tests/safeguards against regression
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Debugging Tools | references/debugging-tools.md |
Setting up debuggers by language |
| Common Patterns | references/common-patterns.md |
Recognizing bug patterns |
| Strategies | references/strategies.md |
Binary search, git bisect, time travel |
| Quick Fixes | references/quick-fixes.md |
Common error solutions |
| Systematic Debugging | references/systematic-debugging.md |
Complex bugs, multiple failed fixes, root cause analysis |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Reproduce the issue first
- Gather complete error messages and stack traces
- Test one hypothesis at a time
- Document findings for future reference
- Add regression tests after fixing
- Remove all debug code before committing
MUST NOT DO
- Guess without testing
- Make multiple changes at once
- Skip reproduction steps
- Assume you know the cause
- Debug in production without safeguards
- Leave console.log/debugger statements in code
Common Debugging Commands
Python (pdb)
python -m pdb script.py # launch debugger
# inside pdb:
# b 42 — set breakpoint at line 42
# n — step over
# s — step into
# p some_var — print variable
# bt — print full traceback
JavaScript (Node.js)
node --inspect-brk script.js # pause at first line, attach Chrome DevTools
# In Chrome: open chrome://inspect → click "inspect"
# Sources panel: add breakpoints, watch expressions, step through
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A aa54134d05e6
debugging-wizard is a skill published in the GitHub repository eric861129/SKILLS_All-in-one (52 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 851 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to debugging-wizard, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ck:fix
Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts --from-quality or --from-test to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists.…
When Stuck - Problem-Solving Dispatch
Dispatch to the right problem-solving technique based on how you're stuck.
thinking-map-territory
When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.
chatcrystal-debug-recall
Recall ChatCrystal memories for debugging tasks involving failing tests, compiler errors, runtime exceptions, dependency issues, environment breakage, or performance regressions. Use when historical root causes, fixes, or pitfalls may accelerate diagnosis before proposing a fix.
pair-programming
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with…
debugging
Systematic root-cause debugging with verification. Use for errors, stack traces, broken tests, flaky tests, regressions, or anything not working as expected. For validating bug reports before fixing, use bug-reproduction-validator agent.