Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/dev-lifecyclenpx skills add ericboehs/claude-plugins --skill dev-lifecyclegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ericboehs/claude-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00063 | $0.03643 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01821 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00729 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00364 |
Grade A, and why
dev-lifecycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 414 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dev Lifecycle
End-to-end feature development: plan, implement, test, validate, review, PR, verify CI, QA demo, merge, and clean up.
Feature request: "$ARGUMENTS"
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user what feature to implement before proceeding.
Phase 1: Understand the project
Before writing any code, understand the project conventions:
- Read the project's
CLAUDE.md(if present) for architecture, testing, linting, and commit conventions. - Check for a
bin/ciscript or equivalent CI pipeline to understand quality gates. - Note any coverage thresholds, linter configurations (
.rubocop.yml,.reek.yml,eslint.config.*, etc.), and testing frameworks. - Identify the default branch:
DEFAULT_BRANCH=$(git remote show origin | sed -n 's/.*HEAD branch: //p')
Phase 2: Plan
Think through the implementation before writing code:
- Identify which files need to change and which new files are needed.
- Consider edge cases, backward compatibility, and test coverage.
- Draft a brief plan (3-7 bullet points) of what you'll implement.
- Present the plan to the user and wait for approval before proceeding. Use AskUserQuestion with the plan summary.
If the user provides specific instructions (e.g., coverage thresholds, linting rules), note them as hard requirements for later validation.
Phase 3: Create a branch
# Ensure we're on the default branch and up to date
git checkout $DEFAULT_BRANCH
git pull
# Create a feature branch
# Use conventional branch naming: feat/, fix/, refactor/, etc.
git checkout -b <branch-name>
Parse --branch NAME from arguments if provided. Otherwise, derive a branch name from the feature description using conventional prefixes (e.g., feat/per-heartbeat-model, fix/session-timeout).
Phase 4: Implement
Write the code and tests:
- Code changes — implement the feature, following project conventions from CLAUDE.md.
- Tests — write tests for the new functionality. Match the project's testing framework and style.
- Documentation — update inline docs, README sections, or CLAUDE.md if the feature changes architecture or public interfaces. Only add docs that are necessary — don't create new markdown files unless explicitly requested.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 414 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A d96910071738
dev-lifecycle is a skill published in the GitHub repository ericboehs/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 3,643 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…