Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add ericboehs/claude-plugins/plugin install code-lintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01344 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00538 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lint
Run configured linters across the full project. Includes whole-project-only linters (brakeman, clippy) that don't run in the PostToolUse hook.
Usage
/lint— Run all enabled linters on the full project/lint ruby— Run only Ruby linters/lint reek— Run only the reek linter/lint semgrep— Run only Semgrep (tool linter)/lint --fix— Run autofix on all files first, then lint
Arguments after /lint are parsed as:
- A language name (ruby, javascript, python, go, rust, markdown, html, shell) → filter to that language
- A linter name (rubocop, reek, eslint, ruff, etc.) → filter to that specific linter
- A tool linter name (semgrep) → filter to that tool linter
--fix→ run autofix commands before linting
Step 1: Load Config
PROJECT_DIR="${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-$(pwd)}"
PROJECT_HASH=$(echo "$PROJECT_DIR" | tr '/' '-' | sed 's/^-//')
CONFIG_FILE="$HOME/.claude/code-lint/$PROJECT_HASH/config.json"
If no config exists, tell the user to run /setup-lint first.
Read and parse the config JSON.
Step 2: Determine Scope
Parse arguments to determine what to run:
- No args → all enabled languages, all enabled linters
- Language arg → only that language's linters
- Linter arg → only that specific linter
--fix→ enable autofix mode
Step 3: Run Linters
For each enabled linter in scope:
Single-file linters
Find all matching files (using file_patterns), excluding paths that match exclude_patterns. Run the linter on all matching files at once (most linters accept multiple files or directories).
cd "$PROJECT_DIR"
# If --fix mode, run autofix first
bundle exec rubocop -A --fail-level=error .
# Then run the lint check
bundle exec rubocop .
Whole-project-only linters
Run these against the project root:
cd "$PROJECT_DIR"
bundle exec brakeman -q
cargo clippy -- -D warnings
Tool linters (e.g. Semgrep)
After running per-language linters, check the tool_linters section of the config. For each enabled tool linter:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 167 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 44ae86b13f1b
lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository ericboehs/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,344 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
lint compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lintericboehs/claude-plugins | Skill | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | today | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| chat-pet-sprite-creationmicrosoft/vscode | Skill | 195k | today | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |