Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ericlovold/sanction/tailwindnpx skills add ericlovold/sanction --skill tailwindgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ericlovold/sanctionWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00857 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
tailwind scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 70 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 499d51c45a3f
tailwind is a skill published in the GitHub repository ericlovold/sanction (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 857 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
reticle-aesthetic
Build landing page sections, hero blocks, and marketing surfaces in the Reticle/Sigil engineering-instrument-grid aesthetic. Use when creating new landing sections, hero components, marketing pages, or when the user says "reticle", "hero", "landing page", "new section", "instrument panel", "grid cell", or wants to…
app-onboarding-questionnaire
Design and build high-converting questionnaire-style app onboarding flows modelled on proven conversion patterns from top subscription apps (Headspace, Noom, Duolingo). Use when building onboarding flows, sign-up funnels, questionnaire UIs, or conversion-optimized first-run experiences. Triggers on "onboarding flow"…
brand
Grounded brand decisions from a curated corpus — archetype, voice, naming, colour psychology, logo-style fit, messaging frameworks, archetype→type mapping. Use to ground brand strategy and identity.
brand-strategy
Ground a brand strategy from the corpus — archetype, opposable positioning, voice and tone, messaging framework. Use to decide who a brand is for, what it stands for, and how it sounds.
copywriting
Marketing copy for homepages, landing pages, pricing pages, and conversion-focused web pages. Use when writing headlines, CTAs, landing page copy, pricing page copy, feature pages, or when the user says "write copy", "landing page", "homepage copy", "CTA", "headline", "conversion copy", or "marketing copy." Based on…
competitive-moat-analysis
Use when mapping competitors, naming defensibility, and finding white-space — moat reasoning, where-to-play, where-not-to-play. Triggers on 'who are we competing with', 'what's our moat'.