expert-panel

expert-panel is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills. It costs 154 tokens per session (2,072 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review process that gathers relevant specialists to score and improve content or strategy. It can assess items such as copy, landing pages, titles, charts, or recruiting evaluations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare versions, identify weaknesses, and improve marketing materials, strategy documents, sales sequences, or candidate evaluations.
Why use it?
It provides structured quality checks and revision rounds instead of relying on one unchecked review.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python3 telemetry/version_check.py 2>/dev/null || true.

Good fit Use it to compare versions, identify weaknesses, and improve marketing materials, strategy documents, sales sequences, or candidate evaluations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
About the project

AI Marketing Skills is a collection of open-source workflows that help AI coding agents handle marketing and sales work, including growth experiments, pipeline management, content operations, outbound outreach, SEO, and finance analysis. It is intended for marketing and sales teams that want reusable agent-driven processes. The catalogue entries package these workflows as skills for compatible coding agents.

ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills · 3,517 stars · on GitHub · singlegrain.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for expert-panel

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for expert-panel

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills/content-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 154 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,072 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00154 $0.02072
Opus 5 $0.00077 $0.01036
Sonnet 5 $0.00031 $0.00414
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00207

Measured 11d ago against content hash fe56ba3adc38, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

expert-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 5 executable files (scripts/content-quality-gate.py, scripts/content-quality-scorer.py, scripts/content-transform.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

content-ops/SKILL.md · 247 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Preamble (runs on skill start)

# Version check (silent if up to date)
python3 telemetry/version_check.py 2>/dev/null || true

# Telemetry opt-in (first run only, then remembers your choice)
python3 telemetry/telemetry_init.py 2>/dev/null || true

Privacy: This skill logs usage locally to ~/.ai-marketing-skills/analytics/. Remote telemetry is opt-in only. No code, file paths, or repo content is ever collected. See telemetry/README.md.


Expert Panel

General-purpose scoring and iterative improvement engine. Auto-assembles the right experts for whatever is being evaluated, scores it, and loops until 90+.


Step 1: Intake — Understand What's Being Scored

Collect or infer from context:

  1. Content/artifact — The thing(s) to score (paste, file path, or URL)
  2. Content type — Copy, sequence, landing page, strategy, title, chart, candidate eval, etc.
  3. Offer context — What's being sold/promoted? To whom? What domain/industry?
  4. Variants — Are there multiple versions to compare? (A/B/C)
  5. Source skill — Is this output from another skill? (e.g., cold-outbound-optimizer) If yes, note the source for feedback-to-source routing in Step 6.

If context is obvious from the conversation, don't ask — just proceed.


Step 2: Auto-Assemble the Expert Panel

Build a panel of 7–10 experts tailored to the content type and domain.

Assembly rules

  1. Start with content-type experts. Read experts/ directory for pre-built panels matching the content type. If an exact match exists (e.g., experts/linkedin.md for a LinkedIn post), use it as the base.

  2. Add domain/offer experts. Based on the offer context, add 1–3 experts who understand the specific industry or domain. Examples:

    • Scoring bakery marketing → add Food & Beverage Marketing Expert
    • Scoring SaaS landing page → add SaaS Conversion Expert
    • Scoring recruiting outreach → add Agency Recruiter + Talent Market Expert
    • Scoring medical device copy → add Healthcare Compliance Expert

Read the full file on GitHub · 247 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 247 lines · 154 tokens per session scan A fe56ba3adc38

Subscribe to this mod's changes

expert-panel is a skill published in the GitHub repository ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills (3,517 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 154 tokens to every session and 2,072 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens