Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add erraggy/oastools --skill validate-specgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/erraggy/oastoolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/erraggy/oastools/validate-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/erraggy/oastools/validate-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/erraggy/oastools/validate-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/erraggy/oastools/validate-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/erraggy/oastools/validate-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00614 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
validate-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Validate an OpenAPI Specification
Step 1: Run validation
Call the validate tool on the user's spec:
{"spec": {"file": "<path>"}}
If the user wants strict validation, add "strict": true.
⚠️ Tip for large specs: Use "no_warnings": true for initial triage. Large specs can produce hundreds of warnings that obscure the actual errors. Get the error picture first, then run again without no_warnings to review warnings separately.
Step 2: Report results
If the spec is valid:
- Confirm it passes validation
- Mention the detected OAS version
- Note any warnings (unless
no_warningswas set)
If the spec has errors:
- List each error with its JSON path and a plain-language explanation
- Group related errors (e.g., multiple missing
$reftargets) - Explain why each error matters and what it would cause in practice (tooling failures, code generation issues, etc.)
Paginating large results
Results are paginated (default limit: 100). When returned < error_count, there are more errors:
{"spec": {"file": "<path>"}, "offset": 100, "limit": 100}
⚠️ Strategy for large error sets: Analyze the first page for patterns — if errors are repetitive (e.g., hundreds of missing path parameters), summarize the pattern and total count rather than paging through all of them. Only page further when errors appear diverse or the user needs specifics.
Step 3: Suggest fixes
For each error, explain how to fix it. Common patterns:
| Error type | Suggested fix |
|---|---|
| Missing path parameter | Add the parameter to the operation's parameters array |
| Duplicate operationId | Rename to be unique, following a verb+resource pattern |
Invalid $ref target |
Fix the reference path, or stub the missing schema |
| Missing required field | Add the field with an appropriate value |
If the errors are auto-fixable, offer to run the fix tool:
{"spec": {"file": "<path>"}, "dry_run": true}
Show the user the planned fixes before applying. ✅ When applying, use output to persist:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 7e0f3e0da997
validate-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository erraggy/oastools (6 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 614 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
orval
Generate type-safe API clients, TanStack Query/SWR hooks, Zod schemas, MSW mocks, Hono server handlers, MCP servers, and SolidStart actions from OpenAPI specs using Orval. Covers all clients (React/Vue/Svelte/Solid/Angular Query, Fetch, Axios), custom HTTP mutators, authentication patterns, NDJSON streaming…
API Test Suite Generator
Automatically generate comprehensive API test suites from OpenAPI specifications covering CRUD operations, error handling, authentication, pagination, and edge cases.
API Contract Validator
Validate API responses against OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, JSON Schema definitions, and consumer-driven contracts to prevent breaking changes.
ocli-api
Turn any OpenAPI, Swagger, or OpenRPC API into CLI commands and call them. Search endpoints with BM25, check parameters, execute — no MCP server needed.
lathe
Initialize CLI-first applications and keep their OpenAPI contract, generated CLI, and Agent Skill synchronized. Use when creating an application with lathe init or changing a Lathe-generated application.
openapi-expert
Expert-level OpenAPI/Swagger specification for API design, documentation, and code generation. Use when the user mentions swagger, API specs, REST, API design, or documentation, or when the task involves OpenAPI Specification, Webhooks, or Polymorphism.