Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ersinkoc/security-checknpx agentmods add skills/ersinkoc/security-check/sc-lang-goWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ersinkoc/security-check/sc-lang-go)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ersinkoc/security-check/sc-lang-go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ersinkoc/security-check/sc-lang-go/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ersinkoc/security-check/sc-lang-go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ersinkoc/security-check/sc-lang-go.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.07441 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.03721 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.01488 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00744 |
Grade B, and why
sc-lang-go scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
// User sends q="; rm -rf /" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
func fetch(urls []string) []string { How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 965 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SC: Go Security Deep Scan
Purpose
Detects Go-specific security anti-patterns, common mistakes, and language-idiomatic attack vectors that generic vulnerability skills cannot catch.
Activation
Activates when Go is detected in architecture.md.
Checklist Reference
References references/go-security-checklist.md.
Go-Specific Vulnerability Patterns
1. Unsafe Package Usage and Reflect Abuse
Pattern: Direct use of unsafe.Pointer to bypass Go type system, or reflect to access unexported fields, disabling memory safety guarantees.
Dangerous functions/patterns:
unsafe.Pointer,unsafe.Sizeof,unsafe.Offsetof,unsafe.Alignofreflect.NewAt,reflect.Value.Pointer(),reflect.Value.UnsafeAddr()- Casting
unsafe.Pointertouintptrand back (pointer arithmetic) - Using
//go:linknameto access internal runtime symbols
Safe alternative: Use type-safe interfaces, generics (Go 1.18+), and exported APIs. If unsafe is unavoidable, isolate it in a single package with extensive tests and document the invariants.
Vulnerable code:
func readPrivateField(s interface{}) string {
v := reflect.ValueOf(s).Elem()
f := v.FieldByName("secret")
// Bypass unexported field protection via unsafe
ptr := unsafe.Pointer(f.UnsafeAddr())
return *(*string)(ptr)
}
Safe code:
// Export the field or provide an accessor method
type Config struct {
Secret string // exported, or use a getter
}
func (c *Config) GetSecret() string {
return c.Secret
}
2. CGo Boundary Safety
Pattern: Passing Go-managed memory across the CGo boundary without ensuring it remains valid, or accepting unsanitized C strings that may not be null-terminated.
Dangerous functions/patterns:
C.CString()without correspondingC.free()- Passing Go pointers to C functions that store them (violates CGo pointer rules)
C.GoString()on untrusted C memory without length boundsC.GoBytes()with attacker-controlled length parameter
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 965 lines · 9 tokens per session scan B 092ef56a9a9b
sc-lang-go is a skill published in the GitHub repository ersinkoc/security-check (56 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 7,441 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (recursive force delete, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ast-grep
Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should be used when users ask to search for…
golang-testing
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…
golang-uber-fx
Golang application framework using uber-go/fx — fx.New, fx.Provide, fx.Invoke, fx.Module, fx.Lifecycle hooks, fx.Annotate (name/group/As), fx.Decorate, fx.Supply, fx.Replace, fx.WithLogger, and signal-aware Run(). Apply when using or adopting uber-go/fx, when the codebase imports go.uber.org/fx, or when wiring…
golang-samber-oops
Structured error handling in Golang with samber/oops — error builders, stack traces, error codes, error context, error wrapping, error attributes, user-facing vs developer messages, panic recovery, and logger integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/oops, or when the codebase already imports…
ax-go-agent-optimize
Use when writing Go code with github.com/ax-llm/ax/packages/go for agent optimization, verified agent-playbook evolution, evaluators, judges, optimizer artifacts, BootstrapFewShot, and GEPA.
gmeasure
Benchmark and measure Go code with gmeasure — an Experiment groups named Measurements, recorded via RecordValue/RecordDuration/MeasureDuration or repeated Sample/SampleValue/SampleDuration with SamplingConfig, timed inline with a Stopwatch, summarized through GetStats/Stats (StatMin/Max/Mean/Median/StdDev…