Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2 --skill carefulgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/careful)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/careful"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/careful/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/careful"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/careful.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00693 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00069 |
Grade C, and why
careful scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
Safety guardrails for destructive commands. Warns before rm -rf, DROP TABLE, This is a copy
92% identical to careful — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
/careful — Destructive Command Guardrails
Safety mode is now active. Every bash command will be checked for destructive patterns before running. If a destructive command is detected, you'll be warned and can choose to proceed or cancel.
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/analytics
echo '{"skill":"careful","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","repo":"'$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")'"}' >> ~/.gstack/analytics/skill-usage.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
What's protected
| Pattern | Example | Risk |
|---|---|---|
rm -rf / rm -r / rm --recursive |
rm -rf /var/data |
Recursive delete |
DROP TABLE / DROP DATABASE |
DROP TABLE users; |
Data loss |
TRUNCATE |
TRUNCATE orders; |
Data loss |
git push --force / -f |
git push -f origin main |
History rewrite |
git reset --hard |
git reset --hard HEAD~3 |
Uncommitted work loss |
git checkout . / git restore . |
git checkout . |
Uncommitted work loss |
kubectl delete |
kubectl delete pod |
Production impact |
docker rm -f / docker system prune |
docker system prune -a |
Container/image loss |
Safe exceptions
These patterns are allowed without warning:
rm -rf node_modules/.next/dist/__pycache__/.cache/build/.turbo/coverage
How it works
The hook reads the command from the tool input JSON, checks it against the
patterns above, and returns permissionDecision: "ask" with a warning message
if a match is found. You can always override the warning and proceed.
To deactivate, end the conversation or start a new one. Hooks are session-scoped.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 64 lines · 87 tokens per session scan C 56d7fd86d730
careful is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2 (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 693 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). It is 92% identical to careful, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
taiyi-integration
A project workflow skill for closing a TaiyiForge change and recording it in a CHANGELOG.md file. It checks review results, tests, and the state of the working tree before archiving the change.
security-pipeline
Use when security verification is needed - pre-commit security checks, vulnerability scanning, STRIDE threat analysis. Integrates with /handoff-verify --security and /commit-push-pr. CWE Top 25 based.
docs-release-notes
Use when a change needs a user-visible release-note, changelog, or changeset entry — "add a release note", "add a changeset for this", "what goes in the changelog?", "write up what shipped", "note this for the next release" — or when finalizing a branch whose customer-visible features, bug fixes, or UI changes should…
docs-sync-internal
Use when code changes on the current branch need matching internal or developer documentation — "update our internal docs", "the architecture docs are stale after this change", "document what I just changed", "do the dev docs still match the code?" — or as a pre-push check that developer docs track the code. Narrower…
pr-description
Use when generating or updating a PR description for the current branch. Takes an optional issue number as argument.
retrospective-audit
Stage B of /prflow:retrospective-weekly: given a most-recent-first subset of one recurring pattern's occurrence-PR context bundles (bounded by auditbundlecap), re-derive the root cause and return one JSON object carrying a ranked findings array (one to three sub-patterns) — no edits, no worktree. Invoked as a subagent…