plan-eng-review

plan-eng-review is a skill for Codex from Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2. It costs 116 tokens per session (20,837 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gs-plan-eng, MIT.

An engineering-manager-style review of a development plan. It examines the architecture, how data moves, unusual cases, tests, and performance, then discusses issues and recommendations interactively.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review architecture, settle an execution plan, and check whether test coverage and performance concerns have been considered.
Why use it?
It helps find technical gaps before implementation begins, when changing the plan is usually easier than changing finished code.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Good fit Use it to review architecture, settle an execution plan, and check whether test coverage and performance concerns have been considered.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2 --skill gstack-plan-eng-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-eng-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for plan-eng-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/gstack-plan-eng-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 116 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 20,837 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 77% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00116 $0.20837
Opus 5 $0.00058 $0.10418
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.04167
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.02084

Measured 2d ago against content hash 2532719e4f5f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-eng-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

77% identical to gs-plan-eng — 681 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/gstack/.agents/skills/gstack-plan-eng-review/SKILL.md · 1,425 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,425 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Preamble (run first)

_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
GSTACK_ROOT="$HOME/.codex/skills/gstack"
[ -n "$_ROOT" ] && [ -d "$_ROOT/.agents/skills/gstack" ] && GSTACK_ROOT="$_ROOT/.agents/skills/gstack"
GSTACK_BIN="$GSTACK_ROOT/bin"
GSTACK_BROWSE="$GSTACK_ROOT/browse/dist"
GSTACK_DESIGN="$GSTACK_ROOT/design/dist"
_UPD=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || .agents/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/sessions
touch ~/.gstack/sessions/"$PPID"
_SESSIONS=$(find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin -120 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin +120 -type f -exec rm {} + 2>/dev/null || true
_PROACTIVE=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.proactive-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
_SKILL_PREFIX=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get skill_prefix 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"
echo "PROACTIVE_PROMPTED: $_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED"
echo "SKILL_PREFIX: $_SKILL_PREFIX"
source <($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-repo-mode 2>/dev/null) || true
REPO_MODE=${REPO_MODE:-unknown}
echo "REPO_MODE: $REPO_MODE"
_LAKE_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.completeness-intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "LAKE_INTRO: $_LAKE_SEEN"
_TEL=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get telemetry 2>/dev/null || true)
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_START=$(date +%s)
_SESSION_ID="$$-$(date +%s)"
echo "TELEMETRY: ${_TEL:-off}"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_EXPLAIN_LEVEL=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get explain_level 2>/dev/null || echo "default")
if [ "$_EXPLAIN_LEVEL" != "default" ] && [ "$_EXPLAIN_LEVEL" != "terse" ]; then _EXPLAIN_LEVEL="default"; fi
echo "EXPLAIN_LEVEL: $_EXPLAIN_LEVEL"
_QUESTION_TUNING=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get question_tuning 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "QUESTION_TUNING: $_QUESTION_TUNING"
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/analytics
if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ]; then
echo '{"skill":"plan-eng-review","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","repo":"'$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")'"}'  >> ~/.gstack/analytics/skill-usage.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
fi
for _PF in $(find ~/.gstack/analytics -maxdepth 1 -name '.pending-*' 2>/dev/null); do
  if [ -f "$_PF" ]; then
    if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ] && [ -x "$GSTACK_BIN/gstack-telemetry-log" ]; then
      $GSTACK_BIN/gstack-telemetry-log --event-type skill_run --skill _pending_finalize --outcome unknown --session-id "$_SESSION_ID" 2>/dev/null || true
    fi
    rm -f "$_PF" 2>/dev/null || true
  fi
  break
done
eval "$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || true
_LEARN_FILE="${GSTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.gstack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
  _LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
  echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
  if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
    $GSTACK_BIN/gstack-learnings-search --limit 3 2>/dev/null || true
  fi
else
  echo "LEARNINGS: 0"
fi
$GSTACK_BIN/gstack-timeline-log '{"skill":"plan-eng-review","event":"started","branch":"'"$_BRANCH"'","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'"}' 2>/dev/null &
_HAS_ROUTING="no"
if [ -f CLAUDE.md ] && grep -q "## Skill routing" CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null; then
  _HAS_ROUTING="yes"
fi
_ROUTING_DECLINED=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get routing_declined 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "HAS_ROUTING: $_HAS_ROUTING"
echo "ROUTING_DECLINED: $_ROUTING_DECLINED"
_VENDORED="no"
if [ -d ".agents/skills/gstack" ] && [ ! -L ".agents/skills/gstack" ]; then
  if [ -f ".agents/skills/gstack/VERSION" ] || [ -d ".agents/skills/gstack/.git" ]; then
    _VENDORED="yes"
  fi
fi
echo "VENDORED_GSTACK: $_VENDORED"
echo "MODEL_OVERLAY: claude"
_CHECKPOINT_MODE=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get checkpoint_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "explicit")
_CHECKPOINT_PUSH=$($GSTACK_BIN/gstack-config get checkpoint_push 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "CHECKPOINT_MODE: $_CHECKPOINT_MODE"
echo "CHECKPOINT_PUSH: $_CHECKPOINT_PUSH"
[ -n "$OPENCLAW_SESSION" ] && echo "SPAWNED_SESSION: true" || true

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,425 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 1,425 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 2532719e4f5f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-eng-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2 (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 20,837 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 77% identical to gs-plan-eng, differing in 681 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

taiyi-dev

A software-development stage that implements planned tasks using test-driven development, or TDD: write a failing test, make it pass, then improve the code. It checks the task plan, dependencies, file boundaries, and required completion evidence.

Dong90/oh-my-taiyiforge · 21 tokens

taiyi-test

A project workflow skill for verifying an implementation and producing a TEST.md record. TDD means writing a failing test, implementing the change, and then making the test pass; this skill checks that process and other regression cases.

Dong90/oh-my-taiyiforge · 24 tokens

verification-engine

Use when verifying build/test/lint before commit, PR, or completion claims. Runs verification pipeline in fresh subagent context with auto-repair. Triggers on /handoff-verify, pre-commit check, build verification, test validation.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 52 tokens

verify-implementation

A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 37 tokens

test-fixing

Run tests and systematically fix all failing tests using smart error grouping. Use when user asks to fix failing tests, mentions test failures, runs test suite and failures occur, or requests to make tests pass.

mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace · 44 tokens

ag-testar-e2e

QA Playwright automatizado: navega como usuario, captura console/rede/UI quebrada e gera relatorio para fluxos criticos e regressao.

andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude · 38 tokens