plan-eng-review

plan-eng-review is a skill for Claude Code from Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2. It costs 116 tokens per session (22,787 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gs-plan-eng, MIT.

An interactive engineering review of a software execution plan, covering architecture, how data moves, unusual cases, tests, and performance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review architecture, confirm the implementation approach, discuss edge cases, and decide what testing is needed.
Why use it?
It helps expose design gaps before implementation begins, when changing the plan is usually easier than changing working code.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to review architecture, confirm the implementation approach, discuss edge cases, and decide what testing is needed.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2 --skill plan-eng-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-eng-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for plan-eng-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ertinox7711/sgrr-agi-v2/plan-eng-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 116 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 22,787 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00116 $0.22787
Opus 5.5 $0.00046 $0.09115
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.04557
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.02279

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 086a53e420ed, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-eng-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to gs-plan-eng — 441 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/gstack/plan-eng-review/SKILL.md · 1,596 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,596 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Preamble (run first)

_UPD=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || .claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/sessions
touch ~/.gstack/sessions/"$PPID"
_SESSIONS=$(find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin -120 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin +120 -type f -exec rm {} + 2>/dev/null || true
_PROACTIVE=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.proactive-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
_SKILL_PREFIX=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get skill_prefix 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"
echo "PROACTIVE_PROMPTED: $_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED"
echo "SKILL_PREFIX: $_SKILL_PREFIX"
source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-repo-mode 2>/dev/null) || true
REPO_MODE=${REPO_MODE:-unknown}
echo "REPO_MODE: $REPO_MODE"
_LAKE_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.completeness-intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "LAKE_INTRO: $_LAKE_SEEN"
_TEL=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get telemetry 2>/dev/null || true)
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_START=$(date +%s)
_SESSION_ID="$$-$(date +%s)"
echo "TELEMETRY: ${_TEL:-off}"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_EXPLAIN_LEVEL=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get explain_level 2>/dev/null || echo "default")
if [ "$_EXPLAIN_LEVEL" != "default" ] && [ "$_EXPLAIN_LEVEL" != "terse" ]; then _EXPLAIN_LEVEL="default"; fi
echo "EXPLAIN_LEVEL: $_EXPLAIN_LEVEL"
_QUESTION_TUNING=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get question_tuning 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "QUESTION_TUNING: $_QUESTION_TUNING"
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/analytics
if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ]; then
echo '{"skill":"plan-eng-review","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","repo":"'$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")'"}'  >> ~/.gstack/analytics/skill-usage.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
fi
for _PF in $(find ~/.gstack/analytics -maxdepth 1 -name '.pending-*' 2>/dev/null); do
  if [ -f "$_PF" ]; then
    if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ] && [ -x "~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log" ]; then
      ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log --event-type skill_run --skill _pending_finalize --outcome unknown --session-id "$_SESSION_ID" 2>/dev/null || true
    fi
    rm -f "$_PF" 2>/dev/null || true
  fi
  break
done
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || true
_LEARN_FILE="${GSTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.gstack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
  _LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
  echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
  if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
    ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-learnings-search --limit 3 2>/dev/null || true
  fi
else
  echo "LEARNINGS: 0"
fi
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-timeline-log '{"skill":"plan-eng-review","event":"started","branch":"'"$_BRANCH"'","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'"}' 2>/dev/null &
_HAS_ROUTING="no"
if [ -f CLAUDE.md ] && grep -q "## Skill routing" CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null; then
  _HAS_ROUTING="yes"
fi
_ROUTING_DECLINED=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get routing_declined 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "HAS_ROUTING: $_HAS_ROUTING"
echo "ROUTING_DECLINED: $_ROUTING_DECLINED"
_VENDORED="no"
if [ -d ".claude/skills/gstack" ] && [ ! -L ".claude/skills/gstack" ]; then
  if [ -f ".claude/skills/gstack/VERSION" ] || [ -d ".claude/skills/gstack/.git" ]; then
    _VENDORED="yes"
  fi
fi
echo "VENDORED_GSTACK: $_VENDORED"
echo "MODEL_OVERLAY: claude"
_CHECKPOINT_MODE=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get checkpoint_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "explicit")
_CHECKPOINT_PUSH=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get checkpoint_push 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "CHECKPOINT_MODE: $_CHECKPOINT_MODE"
echo "CHECKPOINT_PUSH: $_CHECKPOINT_PUSH"
[ -n "$OPENCLAW_SESSION" ] && echo "SPAWNED_SESSION: true" || true

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,596 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 1,596 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 086a53e420ed

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-eng-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ertinox7711/SGRR-AGI-V2 (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 22,787 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to gs-plan-eng, differing in 441 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ratchet-files

Ratchet source file size so every file stays small enough for an agent to read whole: find every file over a token budget, split oversized files by concept, and set up the pre-commit ratchet that stops them from growing. Use when a commit is blocked because a file is over the size budget, when asked to find or split…

dzhng/skills · 0 tokens

recipe-front-review

Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 29 tokens

output-eval-error-analysis

Systematically review workflow traces to identify failure modes before building evaluators. Use when starting an eval project, after significant pipeline changes, or when production quality drops.

growthxai/output · 38 tokens

pr-description-writer

Redacta una descripción de pull request clara y estructurada a partir de un diff de git, resumen de rama o lista de commits. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir una descripción de PR, redactar una solicitud de cambios o documentar cambios de código. Produce una descripción con resumen, motivación, cambios realizados, pasos…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 80 tokens

idea-team

A structured group discussion for exploring a product idea through three roles: researcher, critic, and analogy finder. The roles look for evidence, weaknesses, and useful comparisons.

majiayu000/spellbook · 182 tokens

codex-agent

Use when you want a second-opinion review via Codex CLI, cross-verification after another agent implements changes, debugging help, or alternative implementation proposals. Requires Codex CLI to be installed and authenticated.

majiayu000/spellbook · 45 tokens