weekly-review

weekly-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from espennilsen/pi. It costs 34 tokens per session (555 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided weekly check-in that reviews recent work, personal goals, health, learning, and plans for the coming week.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify wins, check progress on active projects and goals, surface blockers, and plan the next week.
Why use it?
It turns scattered notes, project activity, and other records into one clear picture of what happened and what needs attention next.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Not installable: its command points at a path on the author’s own machine, so it runs nowhere else. The line is /Users/espen/Library/CloudStorage/OneDrive-Espennilsen.net/2-Areas/Digital_Life/Obsidian/e9n.

Good fit Use it to identify wins, check progress on active projects and goals, surface blockers, and plan the next week.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for weekly-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/espennilsen/pi/weekly-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/espennilsen/pi/weekly-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/espennilsen/pi/weekly-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/espennilsen/pi/weekly-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 555 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.00555
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00278
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00111
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00056

Measured 8d ago against content hash 7408528e7527, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

weekly-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/weekly-review/SKILL.md · 69 lines

What it actually says

Weekly Review

Purpose

Help Espen reflect on the past week and plan the next one. Covers professional projects, personal development, health, and learning goals.

Process

1. Gather Context

Read recent activity to build a picture of the week:

# Recent daily notes (last 7)
VAULT="/Users/espen/Library/CloudStorage/OneDrive-Espennilsen.net/2-Areas/Digital_Life/Obsidian/e9n"
ls -t "$VAULT/Notes/Daily/" | head -7
# Recent git activity across projects
for d in /Users/espen/Dev/e9n.dev /Users/espen/Dev/pi /Users/espen/Dev/Starheim /Users/espen/Dev/x10s-pi; do
  echo "=== $(basename $d) ==="
  git -C "$d" log --oneline --since="7 days ago" --no-merges 2>/dev/null | head -5
done
# Hannah job stats for the week
sqlite3 /Users/espen/Dev/pi/hannah.db "
  SELECT COUNT(*) as jobs, printf('\$%.4f', SUM(cost_total)) as cost, SUM(total_tokens) as tokens
  FROM jobs WHERE created_at >= datetime('now', '-7 days');
"

2. Review Structure

Present findings organized as:

🏆 Wins — What went well, what was accomplished 📋 Active Projects — Status of each active project, progress this week 🎯 Goals Check-in — Health, learning, personal development progress ⚡ Blockers — What's stuck and why 📅 Next Week — Top 3 priorities, scheduled commitments, experiments to try

3. Ask Espen

After presenting the review, ask:

  • "Anything I missed or got wrong?"
  • "What should be the #1 priority next week?"
  • "Any new projects or ideas to capture?"

4. Capture (with permission)

If Espen wants, create a weekly review note in the vault:

Weekly Reviews/YYYY-WNN Review.md

Always confirm before writing to the vault.

Tone

Supportive but honest. Celebrate wins. Don't sugarcoat missed goals — frame them as data for adjustment, not failure. Channel stoic philosophy: focus on what's within control, let go of what isn't.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 69 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 7408528e7527

Subscribe to this mod's changes

weekly-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository espennilsen/pi (116 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.