Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add estuary/agent-skills --skill schema-field-redactiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/estuary/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/estuary/agent-skills/schema-field-redaction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/estuary/agent-skills/schema-field-redaction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/estuary/agent-skills/schema-field-redaction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/estuary/agent-skills/schema-field-redaction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/estuary/agent-skills/schema-field-redaction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.02025 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01012 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00405 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
schema-field-redaction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Protect Sensitive Data with Field Redaction
Add redaction annotations to your collection schema to protect sensitive data at the source. Redacted fields are blocked or hashed before documents are stored or materialized.
When to Use
- PII Protection: Hash emails, SSNs, phone numbers for GDPR/HIPAA/CCPA compliance
- Credential Security: Block passwords, API keys, tokens from ever leaving the capture
- Internal Fields: Remove internal-only metadata before materialization
- Data Minimization: Ensure only necessary data reaches downstream systems
How Redaction Works
Redaction is applied at write time — sensitive data never reaches Estuary storage, logs, or downstream materializations. This is the earliest point to remove fields, before derivations or materialization field selection.
Redaction only applies to documents captured after publishing the annotation. To redact historical data, trigger a dataflow reset backfill on the capture.
Redaction Strategies
| Strategy | Effect | Use When |
|---|---|---|
block |
Removes the field entirely | Field should never exist downstream |
sha256 |
Replaces value with salted hash | Need to join/match on field (hash is deterministic per task) |
Prerequisites
flowctlinstalled and authenticated- Write access to the collection you want to modify
- Know which fields contain sensitive data
Key Constraints
- Cannot redact key fields — Would break collection semantics.
blockon required fields — Validation fails with`block` redact strategy cannot be applied at '/path/to/field' because it must exist(the path is a JSON Pointer to the field) UNLESS the read schema references the inferred schema (flow://inferred-schema), in which case the validator suppresses that error automatically. For explicit schemas, remove the field fromrequiredfirst (see Troubleshooting).sha256on non-string-typed fields — At runtime the hasher accepts any type. But at publish time, validation fails with/path/to/field has 'sha256' redact strategy but cannot be a string (types are "<type>")if the field's declared type set has no overlap withstring. A union like["string","null"]or["string","integer"]passes — only a field that cannot be a string at all (e.g., pureintegeror pureobject) is rejected.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 197 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A c5f2df53d606
schema-field-redaction is a skill published in the GitHub repository estuary/agent-skills (7 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 2,025 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
change-data-capture-admin
Use when enabling, configuring, or monitoring Change Data Capture (CDC) entity selection, channel enrichment, and delivery usage limits from an admin perspective. NOT for CDC Apex trigger implementation (use change-data-capture-integration).
stream-processing-designer
Design a stream processing system for unbounded, continuously arriving data. Use when choosing a message broker (Kafka vs RabbitMQ), implementing change data capture (CDC) from PostgreSQL, MySQL, or MongoDB via Debezium or Maxwell, selecting window types for aggregation (tumbling, hopping, sliding, session), joining…
prowler-compliance
Creates, syncs, audits and manages Prowler compliance frameworks end-to-end. Covers the two supported JSON schemas (universal multi-provider and legacy per-provider), the SDK model tree (legacy attribute classes, universal ComplianceFramework, ConfigRequirements guardrails), output formatters (legacy per-framework +…
cocoindex
This skill should be used when building data processing pipelines with CocoIndex, a Python library for incremental data transformation. Use when the task involves processing files/data into databases, creating vector embeddings, building knowledge graphs, ETL workflows, or any data pipeline requiring automatic change…
policy
Define and enforce policies, access controls, and compliance rules over Semantica knowledge graphs.
801-regulations-eu-ai-act
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance…